Skip to main content

Canadian Pacific Railway locomotives are shuffled around a marshalling yard in Calgary in 2012. The railway is rejecting a legal demand by the Quebec government that it help fund the cleanup of Lac-Mégantic.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. says it holds no financial responsibility for the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster and has rejected a legal demand by the Quebec government that it help pay for the cleanup in the devastated town.

The railway announced Thursday that it will appeal the province's legal order.

The news came one day after the provincial government added CPR to a list of defendants it says are responsible for picking up the tab in Lac-Mégantic, where a train derailed on July 6 and dumped millions of litres of crude oil into the environment.

Story continues below advertisement

"Canadian Pacific has reviewed the notice. As a matter of fact, and law, CP is not responsible for this cleanup," railway spokesman Ed Greenberg said Thursday.

"CP will be appealing," he added.

That legal notice demands that the companies named follow a provincial law that holds businesses accountable for the financial impact of an environmental disaster.

The Quebec government says taxpayers should not be forced to pay for the cleanup.

However, attempts so far to ascribe financial liability have produced a flurry of finger-pointing among public and private interests.

Environment Minister Yves-François Blanchet, who signed the order, responded quickly Thursday to CPR's position.

"I will leave it up to lawyers, but let's be clear: under the law on environmental quality, the minister does not ask for, or suggest, compensation … he orders it," Mr. Blanchet said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's not optional," he added.

The disaster killed 47 people and led to a mass evacuation in the community of 6,000. The derailment has since prompted a criminal investigation, several lawsuits and concerns that locals may have to abandon Lac-Mégantic's oil-soaked downtown core.

In the legal notice, the province said CPR was the main contractor responsible for the fateful shipment that was supposed to transport crude from North Dakota oil fields to New Brunswick's Irving refinery.

It handed off the train in Montreal to the smaller Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd., which then operated the tanker train that derailed in the heart of Lac-Mégantic and set off a series of explosions.

MM&A is already among the other companies on the legal notice, but the U.S.-based railway has said it can't afford to pay and has requested bankruptcy protection.

In one court filing, MM&A said its insurance coverage was $25-million and estimated the total cleanup cost would exceed $200-million.

Story continues below advertisement

This week, the federal railway regulator announced it would suspend MM&A's Canadian operating licence because it said the company did not have sufficient insurance coverage.

On Wednesday, the Quebec government also added World Fuel Services Inc. to the legal notice. It's a subsidiary of the petroleum-logistics firm World Fuel Services Corp., which was listed along with another of its branches, Western Petroleum Company, in the initial demand from the government.

World Fuel Services, which stated last month that it had "serious objections to the legality of the order," had bought the crude that was to be shipped to the refinery in Saint John.

The Miami-based company declined to comment Thursday about the updated notice, but in an interview last month with The Canadian Press, its spokesman shifted some of the responsibility to CPR.

"World Fuel Services has absolutely no contractual relationship with MMA," Brian Kennedy said.

"[The company] did business with Canadian Pacific for the transport of the merchandise from North Dakota to New Brunswick … [CPR] were the ones who then offered to subcontract it to MMA," Mr. Kennedy added.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter