Skip to main content

CEO Hunter Harrison says CP will focus capital spending on a rail line between Edmonton and Winnipeg, improvements ‘driven by crude, but it will also enhance the potash and grain coming off that line.’

Chris Young/The Canadian Press

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. isn't sure how long the growth in transporting crude oil by rail will last, so it will stay cautious on its capital spending.

The Calgary-based railway's top executives said Wednesday it will spend cautiously to upgrade tracks and infrastructure used by crude shipments, even though CP expects its number of carloads of crude to double from 70,000 this year to roughly 140,000 or more in 2015.

"It's going to be pretty dramatic," chief executive officer Hunter Harrison said at the company's annual general meeting Wednesday in Toronto.

Story continues below advertisement

Yet with CP still in the middle of restructuring, its annual capital spending will remain in the relatively modest range of $1.1-billion, the same level as outlined in its company-wide cost-cutting plans announced in early December.

An extra $50-million to $60-million could be added, although likely not much more, Mr. Harrison said.

Why the cautious spending? Mr. Harrison questions whether this growth in crude transportation will continue.

As he said to shareholders, there's no telling what the demand for crude-by-rail services will be in a few years, let alone a generation from now. "We're not going to go out and spend capital and build an infrastructure that's going to last 40 or 45 years when we're not so sure how the [crude-by-rail] market will be in five or six [years]," he said.

The company also sees crude-by-rail demand as just one piece in the puzzle to build CP's overall business across multiple sectors. In particular, the railway will focus its current capital spending on a rail line between Edmonton and Winnipeg, which will help the transport of oil but also heavily benefit the shipping of potash and grain.

"It's driven by crude, but it will also enhance the potash and grain coming off that line," Mr. Harrison said. The spending will be mainly on basic track improvements, rail ties and ballast on the trackbed. Another line in North Dakota will receive much of the remaining capital spending. Together, these lines will make up 85 per cent to 90 per cent of capital spending.

Rising demand for crude by rail has put a strong impetus on making these improvements now.

Story continues below advertisement

"Some of this is just moving up things that were in the multiyear plan in 2014 and 2015. Just accelerating and moving them up, because of our strong cash-flow position," Mr. Harrison said.

Both Mr. Harrison and his successor-in-waiting, chief operating officer Keith Creel, said they don't envision possible regulatory approval of the Keystone XL pipeline having an impact on CP's crude-by-rail business.

"I don't look at it as any risk. I think there's a place for both of us, potentially," Mr. Harrison said. "I think they have the ability to execute and move crude very well. I think we offer some flexibility and some latitudes."

Meanwhile, Mr. Creel said that Keystone would target North-South demand down to the Gulf, whereas rail can exploit the East-West market, as well as provide more nimbleness as demand changes between regions.

"Even if Keystone goes in," Mr. Creel said Wednesday, "it's only a fraction of demand that's needed there. So, there's space for both. [Keystone] is the tip of the iceberg."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies