Skip to main content

Schulich-led research has found ‘environmentally sensitive buildings aren’t about costing less, they are about being less risky.’

David Cigan

The Globe's bimonthly report on research from business schools.

Sustainable commercial buildings designed to optimize energy use, as well as limit greenhouse gas, water and waste emissions, have been attracting an impressive amount of global investment dollars over the past decade.

Since 2010, the number of real estate investment firms assessed by the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark has risen to 759 from 198, representing a gross asset value of $2.8-trillion (U.S.), according to Avis Devine, an associate professor at the Brookfield Centre in Real Estate and Infrastructure at York University's Schulich School of Business in Toronto.

Story continues below advertisement

In one sense, it's clear why the trend exists. Previous studies have found that green buildings are in hot demand by commercial renters and attract higher revenues than standard office spaces, for instance.

What hasn't been measured until now, though, is just how far the lucrative returns from sustainable real estate investment can ripple into an entire holding company and its shareholders.

Dr. Devine sought to address that gap in a new study offering what is reported to be the first complete picture of the relationship between global sustainable property investors, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), and their superior stock market performance.

The study examines the effects of sustainable investment on the value and performance of listed real estate investment firms, comparing countries without (the United States) and with (Britain) mandatory environmental reporting on investment properties.

Chief among its findings, says Dr. Devine, is that "environmentally sensitive buildings aren't about costing less, they are about being less risky."

That decreased risk can then translate into financial benefits, such as decreased interest costs, a more highly valued firm and more cash flowing to shareholders.

Co-authored by Erkan Yonder of Ozyegin University in Istanbul, the paper recently won the 2017 Nick Tyrrell Research Prize, an international award recognizing science-based research in the investment industry.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Devine sees the research as a means to encourage more sustainable development by helping investors better understand and get the most of so-called "green premiums."

"I compare it to a person noticing their very fit neighbour owns a treadmill, and, therefore, deciding to purchase a treadmill as well. As we know, it's not owning the treadmill that makes the difference, it's how you utilize it," she says in an e-mail.

Since submitting the work for consideration under the Tyrrell prize, the researchers have moved on to complete a more robust version of the analysis first for the United States, and then with a second paper delving into comparisons with other markets.

Story ideas related to business school research in Canada can be sent to darahkristine@gmail.com.

Editor’s note: The country with environmental reporting standards is Britain, while the one without is the United States. A previous version of the story stated the opposite. This is the corrected version.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter