Skip to main content

In two-income households, domestic chores are an ongoing source of marital stress.

Ryan McVay/Getty Images

Studies have found the chores gap between women with the highest and lowest earnings is as large as the chores gap between men and women.

Jan Paul Heisig at Berlin's Social Science Research Centre detailed this "housework income gradient" in a 2009 study. Income inequality, a growing problem in many countries, makes the gap wider; the more appliances a household owns, the more the gap is narrowed.

In Brazil, the poorest women do 43 hours of housework a week, twice as much as the wealthiest women. In Britain and the United States, the gap between wealthy and poor women is between five and six hours. In almost all the 33 countries studied by Dr. Heisig, the richest women still do more housework, on average, than the poorest men.

Story continues below advertisement

The overall chores gap also varies widely among countries, positively influenced by liberal gender politics, a high percentage of working mothers, and policies such as publicly funded daycare and parental leaves. When their governments support gender equity, even indirectly, women have an easier time handing off the laundry.

Men are pretty good about caring for the sick and grabbing groceries – in a 2012 study of 32 countries, published in the European Sociological Review, only 16 per cent of husbands had never looked after an ill relative and 17 per cent had never bought milk.

But 26 per cent never cleaned, and 46 per cent never did the laundry. The authors concluded that men are more willing to pitch in when the task is occasional. When it comes to the lousy jobs, not so much. That's the real gap women might want to narrow.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter