Skip to main content

Carmen Medina spent 32 years at the CIA as an analyst and self-described organizational heretic. Speaking after retirement to a Providence, R.I., audience, her reference to being an organizational heretic stirred local leadership consultant Lois Kelly to share concerns about the many other rebels at work whose intentions are good but who have nobody helping them.

As the duo started working together, friends warned Ms. Kelly she could sabotage her career, since clients wouldn't like someone helping rebels. But they have persisted, convinced that workplaces are losing out by shutting down the rebels in their midst.

They distinguish between troublemakers and rebels. Troublemakers complain about problems. Rebels create possibilities. Troublemakers are me-focused while rebels are mission-focused. Troublemakers are pessimists, rebels inherently optimistic. Troublemakers sap energy and alienate others, thus work alone. Rebels create energy and attract others.

Story continues below advertisement

Asked in an interview about the rebel who won the presidency of the United States, they counter that the campaign record suggested he is a troublemaker. Through that period he was egotistical, a loner, cynical, great at complaining but weak on presenting solutions – failing to present a picture of what he wanted to achieve. Those are troublemaker traits, quite different from the way rebels act, although the duo suggests time may show different character attributes.

Ms. Medina had many years where she flailed away, ineffectively, at the CIA, before reconfiguring her approach. In the interview and their book Rebels at Work, the duo highlight the mistakes rebels need to stop making, including:

Not prioritizing ideas: Rebels often have lots of ideas so they must discipline themselves to only raise one or two a year, focusing and building support. "Don't say everything that comes to your mind. It's so simple, but I certainly missed it at the CIA," Ms. Medina says in the interview.

On their website, they share questions to determine if something is worth your effort: How much value would this idea provide, does it support the organization's goals, do I believe it's possible, will other people support it and how much do I want to do it? Your answers should be classified as low, medium or high value.

Going solo: If there's no support, it's just one person's idea and won't get very far. To some extent that weeds out people fuelled by ego. They have to figure out how to make "my idea" into something shared by others. "Ideas always become better when people collaborate," Ms. Kelly says.

She also notes that Gallup research shows the value of having a friend at work. Going it alone will just burn rebels out. They need friends.

Failing the pitch meeting: Ms. Medina says she repeatedly got too fired up for meetings where she was intending to pitch her ideas and so wasn't effective. First, you will win the pitch meeting if you don't view it as the mighty moment but have already worked to sell your idea. Second, be brief at the session. Don't view it as selling, but as getting feedback. If you have an hour, speak for 15 minutes (attendees already should have been exposed to the idea) and use the rest of the time to discuss it, getting them engaged. "That's the final step of buy-in. You're making the idea everyone's idea," Ms. Kelly says.

Story continues below advertisement

Not being skilled at handling difficult conversations so you raise the manager's anxiety: Don't view conversations as something you have to win. Indeed, don't view them as combat. Ms. Kelly will often defuse situations by asking others, "How important is this to you?" Often people get tangled up in conflict when the issue is marginal to them and when they realize that, hostility dissolves. Be alert to the narcissism of small differences, which can be illustrated in political groups where people who essentially think alike go to war with each other over minor stuff.

Ignoring personal danger signs: Being a rebel is tough on the soul. There can be ecstatic moments, but more often, there's a feeling of rejection. Take care of yourself. "People are surprised at how important this is," Ms. Medina says. Every night, write down three things that went well. Occasionally write a letter of self-compassion, remembering a difficult time, acknowledging your feelings or thoughts and mentoring yourself with some compassionate advice or encouragement. Also, they stress not "making a Himalayan out of a mountain" – the obstacles you face can be great, not molehills, but still keep your perspective.

Organizations need rebels, they believe. Smart rebels. Rebels who don't make those mistakes.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter