Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

This column is part of Globe Careers' Leadership Lab series, where executives and experts share their views and advice about leadership and management. Follow us at @Globe_Careers. Find all Leadership Lab stories at tgam.ca/leadershiplab.

Does your organization do an annual engagement survey? If so, why, and how do you measure its business impact?

Employees' attitudes and behaviours can influence an organization's success and productivity. There's ample research that suggests a strong relationship among employee engagement, productivity and results.

Story continues below advertisement

The most important output of engagement surveys for most senior leaders is the percentage of employees who are highly engaged, moderately engaged and at risk. The traditional wisdom is, the higher the number of employees who are highly engaged, the better. Areas scored the lowest typically are accepted as the areas to focus on and improve over the next 12 months.

As an example, Company ABC's 2015 engagement scores showed 56 per cent of its workforce was highly engaged, 24 per cent moderately engaged, and 20 per cent at risk. In 2016, after a year of work and effort, the scores improved to 58 per cent highly engaged, 25 per cent moderately engaged, and 17 per cent at risk.

A growing trend by critical human resources leaders is determining what a traditional engagement survey really tells them. Using the Company ABC example:

What does a 2 per cent improvement really mean?

Senior leaders who compare engagement outputs (e.g., key performance behaviours) to key performance indicators are in a position to see what, if any, impact a 2 per cent variance has on results. If this is not done, this 2 per cent variance impact to the organization's overall performance results is unknown. More senior leaders are asking for evidence behind engagement numbers and the linkage to business outcomes that are transparent and evidence-based.

Why are some employees more engaged than others?

Consider two employees with the same training, experience, job, and manager but with different perceptions. Traditional engagement surveys fail to provide insight on why employees working side by side perceive their culture, leadership and jobs differently. More senior leaders want to know not what is going on but why. Beyond engagement is an approach for maximizing workforce productivity that examines the relationship between employees' health and engagement to predict productivity. Beyond engagement facilitates a two-way accountability model, as it highlights what both the employer and employee can do differently.

Story continues below advertisement

What do we know about the 56 per cent who claim they are highly engaged?

More HR leaders are becoming interested in examining the highly engaged group with respect to what percentage falls into each of the three categories: healthy, moderately healthy and at risk. A traditional engagement survey doesn't provide the full story of what's really going on within this group, such as insight on employees' health (e.g., burnout risk). With the growth in numbers of employees with chronic disease and mental health issues in Canada, senior leaders are accepting the linkage among employees' health, engagement and productivity.

What's in it for employees who participate in an engagement survey?

The most obvious benefit is an opportunity to share their point of view of what the organization is doing well and not doing well. But for this 15- to 20-minute investment in time there's no immediate value for employees. Typically, it can be months before they hear or see any impact from an engagement survey. There's a movement to provide employees real time feedback and coaching that can help them improve their engagement, cope with workplace stress, improve attendance, and deal with their total health. The belief is that employees own their health and career. If employees are going to be asked for information to help their employer, this same time can be used for employees to consider what they can control.

Are we using the best engagement survey for our business needs?

It's wise to have the end in mind and to be clear on the why. Picking a survey simply based on price, number of items and speed may not get the desired outcome. The next generation of employers of choice awards is measuring total health that also includes engagement. Whatever tool is used, it's advisable to ensure that it has been created utilizing psychometrics, a field of study concerned with the theory and technique of psychological measurement. It includes best practices such as statistical evidence supporting survey design and analytics. An effective survey tool ultimately provides an accurate baseline to build on and a way to link employees' behaviours to organizational results.

Story continues below advertisement

Bill Howatt is the chief research and development officer of work force productivity with Morneau Shepell in Toronto. He is also the president of Howatt HR Consulting and founder of TalOp, in Kentville, N.S.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies