Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Executive coach Marshall Goldsmith rarely encounters self-confidence problems among his CEO and potential-CEO clients. But when he gives seminars at university MBA programs, with students drawn from lower echelons of organizations, self-confidence is a topic they want to talk about. On Harvard Business School blogs, he offers this advice for those struggling with self-confidence:

Accept imperfection

Don't worry about being perfect when making business decisions. In fact, there are never right or wrong answers in complex business decisions, much as we want to believe we can find such perfect answers. Even Warren Buffett, who is known as The Sage Of Omaha, doesn't get it right every time. "The best that you can do as a leader is to gather all the information that you can (in a timely manner), do a cost-benefit analysis of potential options, use your best judgment - and then go for it," Mr. Goldsmith writes.

Story continues below advertisement

Live with failure

Accept that there will be moments of failure. The best salespeople realize that. They actually get rejected more than ordinary salespeople but they ask for the order more, he notes, and live with their many failures as a necessary step to win their many successes. You are only human. Learn from your mistakes and move on.


After you have made a final decision, commit fully to that course of action. Don't continually second- guess yourself.

Show courage

Even if you are somewhat hesitant on the inside, show courage on the outside. As a leader, those who report to you directly are reading your moods and expressions for clues. "If you show a lack of courage, you will begin to damage your [their]self-confidence," he stresses.

Be happy

Story continues below advertisement

Don't worry; be happy, as the song by Bobby McFerrin tells us. Find happiness and contentment in your work. Do your best and, when you win, celebrate - and when you lose, just start over again the next day.



Overwhelmed? Put less on your plate

It's a well-known diet trick that you will eat less if you use a smaller plate. Consultant Patricia Katz advises the same strategy to prevent being overwhelmed by work. Stop assuming you have 24 hours up for grabs each day and, instead, set aside a reasonable number of hours for rest and renewal. That will make you more cautious about how many commitments you pile on your now-reduced plate. Pause Newsletter

When to get a hot response to a cold call

Story continues below advertisement

The best day of the week to cold call, according to a study of millions of such efforts by Kellogg School of Management's James Oldroyd, is Thursday - almost 20 per cent more effective than Friday, the worst day. The best time: 8 a.m. to 9 a.m., followed closely by late afternoon. Geoffrey James, BNET blogs

Irritated employees head for the door

The conventional wisdom is that people quit companies because of their boss. But after studying more than three million exit interview responses, consultant Beth Carvin says employees leave because of irritations. Some of the most common are limited growth or advancement opportunities, inadequate training, unreasonable workload, dislike of the type of work, perception of unfairness, unreasonable procedures, sexual harassment, perceived discrimination, difficult colleagues, lack of quality products or services, and discomfort with organizational ethics. Canadian HR Reporter

If boards make decisions, who monitors them?

The media focus in Canada after General Motors Co.'s decision not to sell Opel was on auto supplier Magna International, which was jilted at the altar. But Bryant University professor Michael Roberto says the focus should have been on GM's board of directors overruling management and making the decision itself. While we want more effective and vigilant boards, we also expect boards to be monitoring and controlling the decision makers. If boards become the primary decision makers, he asks, who will monitor and control them? Prof. Michael Roberto's blog

Know who your critics are

Story continues below advertisement

If you are a leader, you will attract critics. Thomas Nelson CEO Michael Hyatt suggests distinguishing who they are: friends offering helpful feedback; honest critics, who disagree with you and whose sentiments enrich the continuing conversation about an issue; and unhealthy trolls, who have an agenda and are out to hurt you.



It's known that celebrity endorsers can help bring public attention to a product and encourage more sales. But a study by Ana Rumschisky at the IE Business School in Madrid found that they can also pave the way to a higher price for a product, Knowledge @ Wharton reports.

Testing ads with and without a well known Spanish television host, Prof. Rumschisky found that the students in her sample were willing to pay up to 20 per cent more when a watch was endorsed by a celebrity. Men were more likely to put a greater value on a product when it was celebrity-endorsed than women, but that may be because women were already willing to pay more for the item without an endorsement.

Story continues below advertisement



In interviewing job candidates, we tend to assume the onus is primarily on the applicant to make his or her own case. The interviewer's role is merely to be alert and try to catch the candidate in any misrepresentations.

But Toronto-based management consultant Trevor Hitner says that interviewees should be treated as blank slates: The recruiter's role is to fashion and ask the right questions, in the right manner and in the right order, to elicit responses that will help assess suitability for the position.

"Frequently, the interviewer plays a game of gotcha with the interviewee - looking for weak, rather than strong, points. I have observed that not only is the sequencing of questions important, but also the emphasis and the cadence of the interviewer [have]an impact on how the interviewee responds," he says.

His own approach is to match his cadence, body language and rapidity of questions to that of the interviewee. If the interviewee responds quickly to a question and demonstrates excitement about an issue, Mr. Hitner matches that with excitement and his questions become more rapid-fire. On the other hand, when the interviewee is more reflective in responses, Mr. Hitner also tones down, becoming less garrulous. "I match my temperature, if you will, to the temperature of the person I'm interviewing. It's somewhat difficult to explain but it all speaks to eliciting the strengths of the interviewee," he says.

Story continues below advertisement

Two other tips from him:

Remember the job interview is one of the least effective tools for determining candidate suitability because it tends to focus on the one skill that most people do not need for most jobs: the ability to give an immediate response to a question or issue posed. Usually, we research before.

The best candidate for the position is not necessarily the person with the most credentials and experience. A candidate with one year of experience who has reached a predetermined level of competence may well represent a better choice than a candidate who has taken three years to achieve the same level of competence.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies