Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Electricity polls are being erected along a street in the tsunami-ravaged town of Minamisanriku in Miyagi Prefecture Sunday, March 27, 2011, following the March 11 earthquake and tsunami slammed northeastern Japan.

Ichiro Ohara

Although Japan has suffered a catastrophic triple whammy - earthquake, tsunami, nuclear crisis - financial analysts predict that its economy will rebound, and sooner than we may expect. "Despite the terrifying destruction and the horrific human toll, the long-term impact of the quake on the Japanese economy could be surprisingly small," James Surowiecki wrote in this week's New Yorker. "Will people buy one less iPad because of the earthquake?" Arthur Heinmaa, managing partner of Toron Investment Management, said in a recent Globe and Mail interview. "I don't think so."

If a brisk recovery from a minimum of $300-billion in losses seems an exercise in magical thinking, what about the psychological recovery of a population facing unspeakable hardship? It's hard to imagine bouncing back from the sudden loss of family members - not to mention forfeiting confidence in your food supplies or financial security - and simply suiting up for work in the high-tech, pharmaceutical or automotive industries within a month of such disaster.

Yet that is exactly what is likely to happen with about 90 per cent of those exposed to the Japanese crises, according to George Bonanno, a professor of clinical psychology at Columbia University and author of The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss.

Story continues below advertisement

Most people are incredibly resilient to unforeseen losses, which is all for the good, he says, explaining that our toughness is a byproduct of human evolution over millennia of uncertainties - about predators, about food, and the vicissitudes of the environment. "Though it's very common to read that after facing a disaster entire communities have PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] a lot of what people read is anecdotal," he said.

While anecdotes are perfect ways to transmit the human dimension of catastrophes, they're hardly scientifically sound ways to measure their impact. An exhaustive review of the research literature by Professor Bonanno and two colleagues (Maren Westphal of Columbia, and Anthony Mancini of Pace University), published last November, shows that although individuals vary in their reactions to natural disasters, resilience is the human norm.

The evidence may seem counterintuitive but it's incontrovertible. Disasters cause serious, long-standing harm in a minority of people - almost never more than 30 per cent, Prof. Bonanno said. The person's age, gender, health, income and social connectedness all affect how resilient he or she will be. "Being female puts you slightly more at risk," he noted, "while being older makes you slightly more resilient." As one of the greyest societies in the world, many Japanese senior citizens have already experienced huge losses (some of them in previous quakes, others in Hiroshima or Nagasaki) and have seen their community rebound. Indeed, recent research evidence suggests that exposure to such hardship inoculates people against despair if similar crises recur.

How close you are to the scene of destruction is key. "Super, super exposure" makes you more vulnerable, Prof. Bonanno said. After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, "the PTSD rate in the New York area in the first six months was about 6 per cent. Among those who saw the attack personally, that rate rose to 12 per cent; and among those who had direct exposure - who were in the towers and got out - that rate rose to 25 per cent."

In our close-knit global business communities, many Canadians have colleagues or industry connections in Japan. So what can employers or colleagues do right now to provide support? "Debriefing isn't possible," Prof. Bonanno said, referring to the overwhelming evidence that trauma prevention programs (such as Critical Incident Stress Debriefing) have not only been proven ineffective, they can be harmful. One 2009 study found that those who were "debriefed" after a disaster were worse off, psychologically, than those in the control group.

In any case, it's too early to provide psychological support to the victims in Japan, he said. People need food, water, and concrete, organizational assistance to help find their loved ones. But if there's one thing he learned after working with 9/11 survivors, it's that it is fine to be upbeat: "People want to have a normal relationship with others, even in the worst of times." So if you're interacting with colleagues who work in Japan, "it's okay to smile and laugh after the event. The crux is that people will be okay and the sun will rise again."



Susan Pinker is a psychologist and author of The Sexual Paradox: Extreme Men, Gifted Women and the Real Gender Gap.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies