Skip to main content

It will be difficult to end supply-managed farming. The only practical way to do it might be to do absolutely nothing at all. Market factors that can't be forever suppressed are already producing signs of supply-management irrelevance.

Consider the famous "chicken wars" of New Brunswick. Looking at the supply-managed mess in this single province, former federal agricultural minister Lyle Vanclief asserted that, for chicken producers and chicken processors, "supply management is no longer the status quo in New Brunswick."

If New Brunswick's chicken industry no longer operates on the original rules of supply-managed farming, what rules do they work under? From one perspective, they look remarkably like the limits imposed by cutthroat competition in a laissez-faire capitalist economy.

Story continues below advertisement

"The [Canadian poultry] industry is watching the outcome [in New Brunswick] with well-justified concern," Mr. Vanclief wrote last year in a commentary. "It is abundantly clear that [one of the processor protagonists] is building an American model 'egg-to-plate' fully integrated operation, clearly not a model that was intended by supply-management legislation."

In New Brunswick, two companies have fought for four years to control a market too small for the efficient operation of either, with strategic engagement controlled by out-of-province agents. It's a complicated story. Here is a quick plot guide.

For years, Nadeau Poultry, a New Brunswick company, operated as the province's sole poultry processor: For all practical purposes, a monopoly. Original supply-management regulation, however, stipulated that no single chicken producer could hold more than 10 per cent of the province's chicken quota – thus preventing a processor monopoly from becoming a producer monopoly, too.

Yet Groupe Westco, another New Brunswick processor, abruptly ended Nadeau's monopoly – by buying 51 per cent of the province's chicken quota from some farmers and by forming alliances with others, ultimately giving Westco control over as much as 80 per cent of the province's quota.

With Westco's market control, the Chicken Farmers of New Brunswick, the regulatory body, formally discarded the stipulation that no chicken producer could own more than 10 per cent of the province's quota. It also dropped a provincial registry requirement, the only province ever to do so.

Freed of these regulations, Westco began to ship its chickens to Quebec plants owned by Olymel LP . Operating in Nova Scotia, PEI and Alberta, Olymel is a major player in the Canadian agri-food industry. With annual sales of $2-billion, it exports half of its production to the U.S.

Nadeau Poultry is directly owned by Maple Lodge Farms, a large Ontario-based company that describes itself as "Canada's largest independent family-owned chicken producer" – with product exported to 30 countries.

Story continues below advertisement

Ostensibly a mere jousting for market advantage by two regional companies in a small market, New Brunswick's chicken wars are better understood as strategic conflicts for control of the industry in Eastern Canada – and, ultimately, beyond. Westco is, indubitably, the winner. Nadeau has challenged Westco in the provincial regulatory bodies, in the federal Competition Tribunal, in the federal courts – and achieved no redress. The war is lost.

Yet New Brunswick remains an important outpost in these supply-management conflicts. If all that mattered were whether Westco-Olymel takes more chickens to market than Nadeau-Maple Lodge, they might not be regarded as important. But the chicken wars revealed how far the supply-managed poultry industry has moved from its original 1970s state. The question is: Do these chicken battles portend larger supply-management wars ahead? The answer is: Yes.

It's interesting that former Liberal MP Martha Hall Findlay now publicly condemns the protectionist experiment in agriculture put in place 40 years ago by her own party. But her predecessors did too good a job. Thousands of interlocking laws and regulations will need to be discarded, a process that will take years.

Then there's that other problem: The $35-billion worth of quota that limits Canada's production of milk, turkey, chickens and eggs. Who will pay for those farm asset1s? Would it not be best to let the agri-food companies pay – as Westco did when it bought control of the chicken quota in New Brunswick? Ms. Hall Findlay, please advise.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter