Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz takes part in a news conference upon the release of the Monetary Policy Report in Ottawa, Canada July 15, 2015.

CHRIS WATTIE/Reuters

Many Canadians have experienced being on a flight somewhere warm and tropical and returning home to cold and miserable weather. Leaving Phoenix or Fort Lauderdale, it may have been 30 degrees. But as the plane begins to land at the Canadian destination, the pilot may announce, "The current temperature is 1 degree."

You may ask "Did he say 1 degree? Or -1 degree?" At that point, the difference between water freezing or not will be meaningless. It's going to feel much colder regardless of the negative sign in front of the digit.

The same is true with the current obsession over whether Canada is in recession. The normal definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of contraction in the value of the gross domestic product. Even that definition has been challenged by some economists. And even if Canada avoids a technical recession, what does it matter? The economy is operating far below what it should be.

Story continues below advertisement

Economic management was the trump card for the federal Conservatives, but prospect of the "R" word in 2015 is turning the economy into one big liability. Prime Minister Harper cannot be too pleased with all of these economists debating whether or not we're in recession. The opposition parties must be relishing the prospect of Statistics Canada "confirming" that indeed Canada fell into recession just as the fall election campaign kicks off.

Economists and politicians would do much better if we stopped obsessing over whether or not we are in recession. If the economy eked out a small bit of positive growth in the second quarter, but contracted sharply in the third quarter, we would have technically avoided a recession – but the economy would be in worse shape.

Rather than fussing and arguing over whether we are technically in a recession, the better question to ask is: "Why is the Canadian economy operating far below potential?" That's a more difficult question – one that doesn't produce a binary yes or no answer.

If it is any consolation to Mr. Harper's supporters, the current underperformance of the Canadian economy has nothing to do with the federal government's policies. It has everything to do with slumping world oil prices, disappointing export values and panic in places such as Greece and China. In other words, Canada's lacklustre economic performance is largely not of our own making. The few bits of domestic drivers – the housing market, consumer spending, etc. – have generally been stable. External factors are driving this slump.

But while it's true that most of the current malaise is due to factors beyond our control, it doesn't give us the right to say, "Well, that's just the way it is – nothing we helpless Canadians can do about it." In fact there are things that can be done. They may not jolt us back to life this summer, but they'll pay off in the future so we can avoid repeat performances.

Making our manufacturing exports more competitive would be one place to start. Despite the loonie now well below 80 cents (U.S.), exports to the U.S. have been a surprising disappointment. Why? Because much of our manufacturing sector is still largely oriented to production models of the 1970s and 80s. More niche manufacturing, more global supply chain integration and less costly production should be encouraged.

Another thing we can do is ween ourselves off such a heavy reliance on one or two global commodities (and I'm looking at you, Alberta). The slide in crude oil prices has left Canada's main engine of growth a drag on the economy. But if the energy sector was enlarged to include not just hydrocarbons but also renewable energy systems and environmental management services, the current situation would be far less troublesome. What if Alberta was the world's largest exporter of geothermal engineering services? Or if the world was beating down the door of Ontario companies for waste management services?

Story continues below advertisement

All of this is difficult to suddenly realize. There is no magic wand. But recognizing our economic weaknesses and our vulnerability to global market forces is a place to start. Arguing about whether we are in a technical recession or doesn't change anything – and in fact, it may detract us from the more important work at hand.

Todd Hirsch is the Calgary-based chief economist of ATB Financial, and author of The Boiling Frog Dilemma: Saving Canada from Economic Decline.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies