Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

CPP question for the NDP: who pays, how and when?

New Democratic Party leader Jack Layton speaks to supporters at a campaign stop in Toronto on April 4, 2011.


The NDP has promised to "gradually double the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans, making it possible for Canadians to top up their public pension with personal savings."

But how can CPP/QPP be made bigger?

There is one option that would be both worthwhile and politically viable: a group RRSP or a group TFSA, backed by the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans. It's extremely difficult for small investors to find safe investments that offer low fees and a reasonable rate of return. Governments could help Canadians by providing such a savings vehicle – the mutual fund equivalent of Canada Savings Bonds.

Story continues below advertisement

The financial services industry is likely to be less than thrilled by the introduction of attractive government-sponsored investment options -- one person's costs are another person's benefits -- but then again, the financial services industry is probably not a core NDP constituency.

When it comes down to it, there are only two ways to gradually double a person's Canada and Quebec Pension Plan benefits.

The first is to gradually increase that person's Canada and Quebec Pension Plan contributions.

The second is to make someone else pay for those increased benefits -- someone, somewhere, sometime will have to either make higher contributions, or receive less in benefits.

That's the question for the NDP: who pays, how and when?

The background:

Canadians are often reminded that the Canada Pension Plan is well-funded and financially secure.

Story continues below advertisement

We receive less-frequent reminders of the reason why the CPP is in such good financial shape: contributions are high relative to the amount paid out in benefits.

Contributions total 9.9 per cent of earnings between $3,500 and $48,300 (in 2011). Of that amount, 4.95 per cent comes from the employee, 4.95 per cent from the employer.

Benefits are about 25 per cent of pre-retirement earnings, up to a maximum of $960 per month.

Superficially, CPP does not look like a very good investment -- contributions of almost 10 per cent over a working life of 25, 30 or 40 years, benefits of 25 per cent over a retirement of 10, 15, 20 years.

CPP contribution rates are what they are for two reasons. First, today's contributions are paying for both today's benefits and tomorrow's benefits. Most of today's retirees did not contribute enough when they were working to pay for the cost of the benefits that they are currently receiving. That deficit is being made up for by greater contributions from younger workers.

Second, CPP is a disability insurance plan as well as a retirement plan. Private disability insurance coverage comparable to that offered by CPP would be very costly. (A third factor to remember is that CPP also offers survivor and death benefits).

Story continues below advertisement

It all makes sense from a policy point of view.

But I think it creates a sense of dissatisfaction with the CPP, a sense that "I'm not getting enough benefits." It's that dissatisfaction which I believe has motivated the NDP to promise a gradual doubling of the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans.

Frances Woolley is a professor of economics at Carleton University

Follow Economy Lab on twitter

Report an error
About the Author

Frances Woolley is a professor of economics at Carleton University, where she teaches public finance. Professor Woolley is a former Secretary Treasurer of the Canadian Economics Association, and currently co-editor of Review of Economics of the Household. Her research on taxation and the family was awarded the Purvis Prize in 2001 and the John Vanderkamp Award in 1997. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.