Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Web surfing a boon to productivity, study shows

Getty Images/iStockphoto

Earlier this month, I used this space to pose a question: Can Canada's woeful productivity rate against that of the United States be explained by their relatively stronger collection of manufacturing companies?



The basis of my query was a simple observation: The biggest companies by market capitalization in Canada mostly are banks and the biggest companies in the U.S. mostly are manufacturing companies. Factories tend to be more productive than financial services firms.







Urban Futures was intrigued enough to dig a little deeper. The Vancouver-based research firm decided to go beyond market capitalization and compare the output per worker across all industries in each country. The firm's conclusions are interesting.

Story continues below advertisement







The guys at Urban Futures – Andrew Ramlo, David Baxter, Ryan Berlin – found that employees are dispersed across industries in Canada about the same as they are in the U.S. For example, government accounts for 17 per cent of all jobs in both the U.S. and Canada. The same 10 industries are the largest employers in each country, although the ranking is slightly different. The majority of workers – 70 per cent in Canada and 77 per cent in the U.S. – work in these industries.







In other words, the Canadian and U.S. economies are rather similar, undermining the hypothesis that some of the American productivity advantage might be explained by a stronger representation of highly efficient industries.







So we're back where we started: Why is Canada's productivity rate so terrible? The Urban Futures report shows that the labour productivity rate in government is 65 per cent below the average in Canada, and only 29 per cent below the average in the U.S.; labour productivity in professional, scientific and technical services was 21 per cent below the average in Canada, while it was 30 per cent above the average in the United States.







"Research on this topic is abundant; however, definitive and specific answers are not," the report says.



The Urban Futures study cites work by Statistics Canada that suggests the productivity gap has little to do with skills or capital intensity, but rather weaker growth in multifactor productivity – output relative to all inputs. For example, this analysis suggests the decline in Canadian manufacturing productivity could be explained by the rise in the value of the Canadian dollar.







This analysis is important because policy makers need to know where to concentrate their efforts. As the population ages and people retire from the work force at a faster rate than they are replaced, the only way to generate more economic growth is through productivity gains.







"The next chapter of research into Canada's labour productivity performance should delve further into issues relating to multifactor productivity, measuring more precisely the role played by technological change, market scale, barriers to trade and market entry, and intermediate inputs such as energy, materials, land, and purchased services."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies