Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Latest Fed meeting won’t match dramatics of December

U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke.


Ben Bernanke will have a tough time matching his dramatic December vow to keep interest rates ultra-low and easy money flowing until the U.S. cleans up its jobless mess.

Wednesday's conclusion to the U.S. Federal Reserve's first monetary policy meeting of 2013 is likely to be much less dramatic.

No change is expected to the Fed's commitment to keep rates low indefinitely by hoarding billions worth of bonds and mortgage-backed securities – so-called quantitative easing.

Story continues below advertisement

That's because the economic recovery remains uneven, inflation is in check and the jobless rate – at 7.8 per cent – remains well above the 6.5 per cent target set by Mr. Bernanke, the Fed chairman.

There's also no Fed press conference scheduled, and no new economic forecasts to release.

That doesn't mean Wednesday's statement will be a total yawn.

The last paragraph – indicating who voted and how – could prove to be the most telling. Four new regional federal presidents rotate on to the federal open market committee (FOMC) this year. The most notable departure is Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker, an outspoken inflation hawk who has vigorously opposed Mr. Bernanke's embrace of QE from the start.

The Fed is poised to shift over the next few months from ramping up its bond purchases – now running at $85-billion (U.S.) a month – to eventually winding them down. The debate around the committee table will turn to exit timing, at this and future meetings.

The betting is that an exit won't come until next year at the earliest. Based on the Fed's own projections, the unemployment rate won't fall to 6.5 per cent until 2015.

One of the four newcomers – Kansas Fed President Esther George – has expressed concerns about the fallout from all the bond-buying. But she's not nearly as doctrinaire as Mr. Lacker. And her views will likely be offset by Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren, a big QE fan, who also joins the FOMC this year.

Story continues below advertisement

This conundrum for the Fed is that the economic signals remain mixed. Economists estimate that the U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 1.2 per cent in the fourth quarter. Consumers are still tentative, probably a reflection of the higher payroll taxes that kicked in this month (the U.S. Conference Board's consumer confidence index fell for the third month in a row in January).

On the other hand, the housing market has clearly turned the corner and a manufacturing renaissance is underway.

The danger for the Fed is that today's slow growth turns into a boom, and its foot is still firmly on the QE pedal.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
National Business Correspondent

Barrie McKenna is correspondent and columnist in The Globe and Mail's Ottawa bureau. From 1997 until 2010, he covered Washington from The Globe's bureau in the U.S. capital. During his U.S. posting, he traveled widely, filing stories from more than 30 states. Mr. McKenna has also been a frequent visitor to Japan and South Korea on reporting assignments. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨