Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

On Tuesday, the Liberal Party introduced a new Canada Learning Passport, which would pay $1,000 per year to high-school students who have an RESP account.

Moe Doiron/The Globe and Mail

Federal financing for post-secondary students rests on three pillars. First is the Canada Student Loan Program. Second is tax-assisted savings in Registered Education Savings Plans and the associated Canada Education Grants/Canada Learning Bonds. Third is a suite of non-refundable tax credits, including the student, textbook, and tuition credits.



On Tuesday, the Liberal Party introduced a new Canada Learning Passport, which would pay $1,000 per year to high-school students who have an RESP account ($1,500 per year for lower income families). This money would be deposited into the RESP account, to be used by the student if they attend a post-secondary institution. To pay for part of this, the proposal cancels the Student Amount and the Textbook Amount tax credits. For a student studying for eight months, this would mean a loss of $558 of federal credits.



The non-refundable tax credits reduce a student's taxes when taxes are filed. If taxes are reduced to zero, any unused amount can be transferred to the student's parents or can be carried forward to reduce the student's taxes in future years when they are working.

Story continues below advertisement



One way to think about the new Passport grant is that it collapses part of the third pillar into the second. That is, it takes the money that would have gone into the tax credits and reallocates it into grants that go into RESPs. This amounts to about $700-million a year (as far as I can tell from this source, if you include the pro-rated share of transferred and carried forward credits).The credits don't amount to enough money to pay for all of the new grants, so the program would require new resources as well.



Is a switch from non-refundable credits to the Passport grant desirable? There are two important features of this switch.



First, the money is provided up front, rather than when taxes are filed next year or in the future. Students earn much more during their lifetimes than those without post-secondary education, but they are cash crunched. Giving them money up front instead of later on therefore may be useful.



Second, there may be a difference in who gets the money. Previous research has found that high-income families are more than three times as likely as low-income families to hold an RESP account. While it's possible the new grants will provide enough incentive to get more participation from lower-income families, it remains an open question. The credits, on the other hand, depend only on filing a tax return that has taxes owing either now or in the future. Whether credits or grants would have better take-up is a tough call, but the key will be making an effort to ensure broad awareness and revamping the complicated sign-up process. The danger here is that the takeup will be as skewed toward high income families as the existing CESG/RESP programmes, meaning that the aim of improving access would be thwarted.



The other political parties and various commentators have found several bugs with the proposal -- ranging from what happens to CEGEP students to how RESP income is treated by provincial and federal student aid programmes. However, with some further work, the Learning Passport proposal shows some promise as a way to transform the structure of funding for post-secondary students.



Kevin Milligan is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of British Columbia



Follow Economy Lab on twitter

Story continues below advertisement



Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies