Skip to main content
david rosenberg

With the U.S. Federal Reserve's second round of unconventional stimulus set to draw to a close at the end of the month, it's finally possible to assign a grade to what has become known as QE2.

To make the grade as fair as possible, let's go back to the goals for the program that Fed chairman Ben Bernanke laid out in an op-ed column in the Washington Post last November, the day after the Fed announced its second round of quantitative easing.

He wrote: "Higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion."

How well has QE2 worked in achieving those goals? Let's look:

"Higher stock prices" From the time of Mr. Bernanke's op-ed to the middle of January, the S&P 500 rallied by just over 8 per cent. It has not done a thing since. Grade: One big fat B.

"Consumer wealth" Yes, the "equity wealth effect" did boost net worth by $2.4-trillion (U.S.) in the fourth quarter of 2010, but this slowed to just $943-billion in the first quarter (at an annual rate). Mr. Bernanke made no mention that much of this equity "wealth" would be offset by large declines in real estate asset values — a $226-billion decline in the fourth quarter and an even larger $338-billion contraction in the first three months of 2011. Grade: B-.

"Increase confidence" Uh oh. The Conference Board confidence measure did surge from 49.9 at the onset of QE2 to 72.0 in February, but since then it has declined to 60.8, reversing half of the initial burst. If sustainability is the key, then it is tough to give this a very good grade. Nice job in the first half, but a lousy second semester. Grade: C-.

"Spur spending" The six-month trend in real consumer spending was running at a 3.2-per-cent annual rate at the time QE2 was launched last November. That pace is now 2 per cent. On this basis, it doesn't look as if QE2 made the grade. Grade: D-.

"Higher incomes" The six-month trend in real personal disposable income was rising at a tepid 0.8-per-cent annual rate at the time of QE2; it is now an even more tepid 0.6 per cent. To the back of the class, QE2! Grade: F.

"And profits" In the quarter just prior to QE2, U.S. corporate profits were rising at a 34.8-per-cent pace, year over year. The trend has moderated to 16.1 per cent in the fourth quarter and stood at 7.8 per cent in the last quarter. Grade: C-.

"Support economic expansion" What can you say about a meagre 1.8-per-cent GDP growth rate in the first quarter and little better than 2 per cent for the second quarter? Grade: D-.

Mr. Bernanke gave himself his own report card earlier this month when he came right out and declared that "until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established."

This admission after 30 months of zero policy rates and 27 months of unprecedented expansion in the central bank balance sheet is startling and disquieting.

Indeed, during this fragile two-year-old recovery, despite all the stimulus, there has not been one quarter – not one – in which GDP growth performed better than the historical norm. I'll be generous and give QE2 an overall grade of D.



Follow related authors and topics

Authors and topics you follow will be added to your personal news feed in Following.

Interact with The Globe