Skip to main content

Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay speak with The Canadian Press during an interview in Ottawa on Jan. 16, 2013.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay recently announced that she would create a national child care and early learning program that would "end the daycare dilemma." While we could argue about the benefits of such a program, that is not my interest. In fact, the benefits are well articulated and understood.

But what about the costs of the proposal? To an economist, costs include everything you have to give up to do the activity; both direct costs and opportunity costs. While direct costs are often (though not always) mentioned, what is missing from this policy proposal – and what is, in fact, missing from all policy proposals from all politicians of every stripe – is the opportunity cost of their proposal.

What is opportunity cost? Opportunity cost is not about the costs and benefits of a particular proposal. Opportunity cost is directly connected to scarcity, which means having more of one thing means having less than of something else. Opportunity cost is simply the value of the next-best alternative not chosen.

Story continues below advertisement

Opportunity cost is about trade-offs. Recognizing trade-offs is the first step toward making wise choices. How do you decide whether you want something if you do not know what you are giving up?

The key to using the concept of opportunity cost correctly lies in recognizing precisely what taking a given action prevents us from doing. Do most of us want a national child care and early learning strategy? Sure, seems like a great idea. Are you willing to give up all of our boutique tax credits (e.g. Child Fitness Tax credit) to get it? Most of us would probably say yes to this trade-off. Are you willing to give up national health care to get it? Most of us would probably say no to this trade-off.

Only by understanding opportunity cost do we fully understand the choice being made. It is essential information to being able to decide if the benefits of a proposal truly outweigh all the costs of a proposal.

When politicians do not provide us with information about the opportunity cost of a program, policy, proposal, regulation, etc., how can we make a wise choice? Unfortunately, our politicians never provide information on opportunity costs for their proposals.

To quote Mike Moffat, "There are all kinds of opportunity costs when it comes to public policy. I just wish politicians of all parties had a better understanding of the concept. It would lead to improved public policy and a more informed electorate." Do our politicians understand the concept of opportunity costs? They seem to, but only when they critique an opponent's proposal. Too bad they fail to follow the advice they so freely dole out to others.

In the spirit of advancing public policy design and implementation in Canada, I challenge Martha Hall Findlay and all politicians to think carefully about opportunity cost and communicate this to the electorate. I also challenge the electorate to push politicians to reveal this information. After all, great policy is all about conscious choice.

Lindsay Tedds is an Assistant Professor of economics in the School of Public Administration at the University of Victoria. You can follow her on Twitter.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter