Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Private venture capital spurs most innovation: C.D. Howe

A new report by the C.D. Howe Institute says venture capital pools created by tax incentives, including labour-sponsored investment funds (LSIFs), are the worst performers.

Pawel Dwulit/The Globe and Mail

The dearth of venture capital is at the heart of Canada's innovation woes.

A new C.D. Howe study makes two important findings: venture capital is better at spurring innovation than direct investment in research-and-development, and Canada does too little of it.

Venture capital investment peaked at more than $5-billion in 2000 and has been falling steadily since, according the study by Tariq Fancy, released Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Venture capital investments now make up less than 0.10 per cent of gross domestic product in Canada, compared to 0.20 per cent in the U.S.

The report comes as Ottawa is looking at how to spend $400-million it committed to venture capital in last year's budget .

"Canadian policymakers are correct to focus on venture capital as a critical component in promoting innovation, but they should focus less on the overall size of the VC market in Canada and more on promoting the right kinds of VC funding," argued Mr. Fancy, an entrepreneur and former member of the CPP Investnment Board.

"Not all VC is created equal."

The report looked at various types of venture capital in Canada and compared their relative success at promoting new patent filings.

The clear winner was private venture capital, which "promotes innovation considerably better than business R&D on a dollar-for-dollar basis," according to the study.

Less successful are bank-sponsored venture capital and government investment pools, such as the Business Development Bank of Canada. By far the worst performers are pools created by tax incentives, including labour-sponsored investment funds (LSIFs).

Story continues below advertisement

"If government money is to be spent, spend it wisely," Mr. Fancy concluded. "Doing nothing at all would be arguably better than subsidizing LSIFs."

Instead, government should promote private and institutional venture capital, or "failing that," put more money into arms-lengths agencies, such as the Business Development Bank of Canada or the Export Development Corporation.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
National Business Correspondent

Barrie McKenna is correspondent and columnist in The Globe and Mail's Ottawa bureau. From 1997 until 2010, he covered Washington from The Globe's bureau in the U.S. capital. During his U.S. posting, he traveled widely, filing stories from more than 30 states. Mr. McKenna has also been a frequent visitor to Japan and South Korea on reporting assignments. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨