Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Shoppers at a Toronto mall in a file photo form 2011. Average weekly earnings of non-farm payroll workers are up 3.6 per cent on a year-over-year basis. Given that the inflation rate is now just 1.8 per cent, that means that wages are up in ‘real’ terms.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Let's get this straight: Canada is not in recession, nor has it been in recession since, oh, 2009. We are not even really in a 'recovery': Canada has been growing so long now that this is just a plain-vanilla expansion. Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of Canada, said so this week -- but then again what does he know, right?

You can pick your favourite definitions of recession and Canada still comes out as having been in expansion mode since, oh, 2009. The old-style textbook way of defining these things is by looking at gross domestic product. If the economy goes down for a couple of quarters in a row, that's a recession. That did happen to Canada in late 2008 and into 2009 – but gross domestic product has been rising since.

Then again, the GDP method of defining a recession is pretty narrow, and it is not really in vogue anymore. In the U.S., the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) calls a recession when its smorgasbord of economic indicators (including things like inflation-adjusted sales and industrial production) move lower, but it also uses its judgment when defining expansions and recessions.

Story continues below advertisement

In Canada, Statistics Canada uses a similar judgment-based system definition and called the end of recession as happening in 2009. More recently, a group of economists under the umbrella of think tank the C.D. Howe Institute has adopted a NBER-style dating method. It says the Canadian recession started in 2008 and was over seven months later, in early 2009.

Other people have different definitions. For the average worker, all that matters is whether or not they are employed, and whether they are making wage gains.

The unemployment rate in Canada was 7.4 per cent as of September, which is still higher than the 5.9 per cent low touched in September, 2007. Still, as of September, 2012, Canadian employment was 471,000 higher than at the pre-recession peak in May, 2008. You can argue that not every one of those jobs has come with gold-plated benefits, but it is still a pretty solid picture.

If you want to look at the dark side of this, you can go with the employment to population ratio – the proportion of people working compared to the total working age population. That one has not recovered to its pre-recession level: it was 61.9 per cent in September, compared to 63.7 per cent pre-recession. That is not necessarily a bad thing though: a lot of the people not working are in school instead, which is presumably a good thing in the long run. There is also a demographic bias towards a lower employment population ratio as Canada ages, and some of that is probably at play here too.

So people are working – but are they getting ahead? Well, for that we can look at the just-released data from the Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours. Average weekly earnings of non-farm payroll employees were up 3.6 per cent on a year-over-year basis. Given that the inflation rate is now just 1.8 per cent, that means that wages are up in 'real' terms. Again, not every person in the country is getting ahead – but the country is.

So what gives? Why is everyone still so downbeat?

You can argue that the current malaise is a reaction to the dreadful news from elsewhere in the world, and I would not disagree.

Story continues below advertisement

But there are other factors at play. My favourite indicator of 'recession' or 'expansion' mentality is something I call the 'holiday party indicator'.

In good times, companies spend freely on lavish holiday parties. As things darken, those frills are the first to go. In 2008, a lot of those parties were shut down and, as it turns out, shut down for good. According to a survey by the Human Resources Planning association, 39 per cent of employed Canadians are not expecting a blow out this year. It is not clear what the parties that do happen will be like, but, anecdotally, it seems like a lot of lavish soirees have been permanently been replaced by potlucks.

So yes, the statistics are pretty good but something major shifted four years ago, and it has not shifted back. Employers and employees both expect the worst to happen at any time – and that is affecting everyone's mood.

Perhaps it's the growing pile of household debt that is sparking the unease. One one hand, the credit binge does not point to a country where people are worried about the future.

A sluggish global economy is keeping your monthly payments low. But if growth picks up, Mr. Carney is certainly going to raise interest rates. You might get the holiday party back, but it's going to come with higher mortgage payments.

Linda Nazareth is the principal of Relentless Economics and senior fellow for economics and population change at the Macdonald Laurier Institute. Visit her at relentlesseconomics.com

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies