Skip to main content

Pedestrians head for work among the highrise buildings at Spadina Avenue and Bremner Boulevard in Toronto.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The International Monetary Fund says Canada could better manage boom-and-bust commodities cycles by stashing away more tax revenue in good times.

Both Ottawa and the resource-rich provinces should make better use of so-called "stabilization funds" to manage the inevitable volatility in the price of oil, natural gas, coal and other commodities, the Washington-based lender said in its annual report on the Canadian economy.

"There is room to do more to insulate [Canada's] fiscal position from commodity price volatility and to mitigate its impact on the economy," Roberto Cardarelli, the IMF's mission chief for Canada, told reporters in Ottawa after releasing the report Thursday.

Story continues below advertisement

Several provinces, including Alberta and Quebec, have special "rainy-day" funds to save resource royalties for future years. But Ottawa does not collect resource royalties and has never specifically set aside tax revenue during resource booms.

With oil and gas production expected to double in Canada over the next decades, now is the time to start putting in place a "fiscal framework" that would offset the inevitable rise and fall of tax revenue, the IMF said.

Mr. Cardarelli said Canada could "benefit" by looking at what other resource-rich countries have done, including Norway, which has amassed the the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world.

During their consultations, Canadian officials rejected the idea of doing anything at the federal level because it doesn't collect resource royalties, according to the IMF report said.

The IMF said it expects the Canadian economy to bounce back in the second half of 2013 as companies unlock frozen capital expenditure budgets and exports rise due to an improving U.S. economy.

The IMF is forecasting "lower average growth" of 1.8 per cent this year in Canada as the economy lurches through a current weak patch, before accelerating to roughly 2.5 per cent a year in 2014-15.

"Our outlook for the Canadian economy is a relatively rosy one," Mr. Cardarelli said.

Story continues below advertisement

In its formal assessment of the report, the IMF executive board nonetheless said the "balance of risks remains tilted to the downside."

The IMF also expressed concern about the housing market, which it estimates is overpriced by an average of 10 per cent across the country, based on an analysis of international rental rates and incomes. And it said authorities might eventually have to do more to cool off the market and curb excessive borrowing.

"These levels are unsustainable and an adjustment is likely," Mr. Cardarelli warned.

But speaking to reporters, Mr. Cardarelli said the IMF expects a soft landing and that's been reinforced by recent evidence of falling sales and prices in some markets. So long as the economy keeps growing and adding jobs, he said the housing market could absorb a 10-per-cent correction over a five-year period of flat prices without a precipitous fall, such as the 30 per cent correction seen in the U.S..

Still, the IMF said high household debt and inflated house prices make the country more "vulnerable to adverse macroeconomic shocks." That, in turn, could create a negative loop between bank balance sheets, house prices and construction activity.

Like many Canadian economists, the IMF is calling for a "soft landing" of the housing market, rather than a crash. The IMF credited conservative lending practices, the high levels of equity Canadians have in their homes and the backstop of government-backed mortgage insurance.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter