Skip to main content

Rueben George, project manager of Sacred Trust with the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation, pictured on Tuesday May 26, 2015. Mr. George celebrated with the aboriginal protesters at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation last week when the Obama administration delayed a $3.7-billion (U.S.) oil pipeline project that would run past the community straddling the North and South Dakota border.DARRYL DYCK/The Globe and Mail

Rueben George of B.C.'s Tsleil-Waututh First Nation celebrated with the aboriginal protesters at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation last week when the Obama administration delayed a $3.7-billion (U.S.) oil pipeline project that would run past the community straddling the North and South Dakota border.

Mr. George is manager of the band's Sacred Trust – formed to oppose Kinder Morgan Inc.'s proposed expansion on the Trans Mountain pipeline – and visited Standing Rock last week with a ceremonial totem to show the support of his West Coast people for their fight.

He wasn't alone. From across Canada and the United States, aboriginal leaders rallied to the cause of the Sioux community, which argued the proposed pipeline would disrupt burial grounds and threaten the reservation's water supply.

The standoff at the Missouri River is the latest hot spot in a continent-wide struggle between indigenous communities and an oil industry eager to build additional pipelines to move crude to global markets, or to carry it from recently developed fields like North Dakota's Bakken.

The Sioux and their allies won a reprieve on Friday when the U.S. Justice Department and Army Corps of Engineers announced no work would continue until the government could consult more fully with the aboriginal opponents.

The widely watched protest and the victory – even if it is temporary – will fuel the determination of aboriginal leaders to defend their rights, whether in the courts or in direct action.

Industry leaders are being reminded once again about the vital need to win over indigenous communities.

In Canada as well as in the U.S., First Nations are asserting the right to approve or reject pipeline projects that traverse their traditional territory, and demanding to be treated as full partners by industry sponsors and governments. In Canada as well as in the U.S., governments are struggling to recognize the United Nations principle of free, prior and informed consent without handing every First Nation that could be impacted by a resource project a veto of its fate.

Mr. George said the Tsleil-Waututh and other First Nations communities are sentinels who place a great priority on their connection to the Earth. They are making common cause with non-native environmentalists to urge dramatic action on climate change and oppose new pipelines that they say would threaten waterways and facilitate oil-industry expansion.

"We have a reciprocal, spiritual relationship with the land and water," Mr. George said in an interview from Winnipeg. "We defend them as … someone would defend his children or his family."

In a statement issued last week, the Assembly of First Nations supported the Standing Rock Sioux, as AFN regional chief Kevin Hart joined the protesters.

"No pipeline construction should ever begin until … the indigenous peoples [who are impacted] have provided their free, prior and informed consent consistent with the United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous people," AFN National Chief Perry Bellegarde said.

The Liberal government has endorsed the UN declaration but is more guarded with regards to the issue of consent and whether it essentially confers on aboriginal communities a veto over resource projects.

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled indigenous people should be "consulted and accommodated" when projects would impact their rights – a standard which industry leaders argue falls short of a veto.

Asked about Chief Bellegarde's declaration, National Resources Minister Jim Carr stressed the need for "consultation," but dodged the question of consent.

"I've had many conversations with Chief Bellegarde and I respect very much the point he has made about meaningful consultation with communities," Mr. Carr said in a conference call with reporters Friday. "We understand that [and] we're giving life to that value."

The issue of consent is particularly complicated when it comes to expansive projects like pipelines that often touch scores, even hundreds of First Nations communities.

In projects like Enbridge Inc.'s Northern Gateway, Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain and TransCanada Corp.'s Energy East, industry proponents claim support – and even partnership – from some aboriginal communities and question the right of a few opponents to block the interest of those who support it.

But clearly, some communities have more at stake than others. The Tsleil-Waututh are based in Burrard Inlet where the Trans Mountain pipeline ends – their name means "People of the Inlet."

As the Liberal government weighs later this fall whether to approve the expansion of the Trans Mountain project, ministers will have to consider the precedent of Standing Rock.

Editor's note: A previous version of this story had an incorrect headline.