Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Imagine that a Canadian company flies a group of MPs and their spouses to a conference in Paris or Hong Kong, puts them up in a luxury hotel, and then plies them with food and wine.

Think this kind of junket is prohibited? Not necessarily.

The conflict-of-interest code for members of Parliament prohibits accepting "any gift or benefit … that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence the member."

Story continues below advertisement

But there's a special exemption for travel if it "relates" to an MP's work in the House of Commons, providing that details are disclosed to the federal ethics commissioner.

The result is a troubling contradiction. It's sometimes okay for MPs to accept free travel from people who are actively lobbying them.

"It's a gaping hole in the MPs' ethics rules," argued Duff Conacher, the founding director of Democracy Watch.

"If someone's lobbying you, they shouldn't give you anything," he said.

In August, Goldcorp Inc. flew four MPs and a senator on the Vancouver-based mining company's jet to its Marlin mine in Guatemala and to meet local government officials. On the trip were Conservative MPs Dave Van Kesteren and Dean Allison – both members of the Foreign Affairs and International Development Committee – plus Liberal MP Massimo Pacetti, Independent MP Bruce Hyer and Liberal Senator Mac Harb.

The trip would likely still be a secret if someone hadn't leaked the itinerary.

That's because oversight of these dealings falls under two sets of rules – one for lobbyists and one for MPs. Lobbyists must disclose who they're talking to, and MPs must report where they went, for how long, who paid and how much, within 60 days. But the two sets of filings are mutually exclusive. The lobbying report won't mention that the lobbying took place during a foreign junket. And the ethic commissioner's report comes out only once a year. But you'd have to read both reports to see the full picture.

Story continues below advertisement

Disclosure is great, but only if it offers a clear idea of what's going on. Current rules provide much less.

Goldcorp disclosed simply that it lobbied the five members about "mining and economic development." But the filing omits the critical fact that it also flew the MPs to Guatemala for three days.

The MPs who went are unapologetic. "I'm not sure what the conflict is," Mr. Pacetti told the CBC. "I know there's a certain perception, but I'm comfortable with it."

Mr. Hyer, who has several Goldcorp operations in his Northern Ontario riding of Thunder Bay-Superior North, similarly denies doing "anything wrong."

It's not about wrongdoing. It's about perception and the subtle nature of influence. Many MPs and senators self-censure, avoiding such trips.

MiningWatch Canada, which found out about the trip, argues that voluntary restraint isn't good enough. What's needed is an outright ban.

Story continues below advertisement

"Trips like these jeopardize the integrity and independence of our elected officials," said Jen Moore, the group's Latin American co-ordinator. If Parliament thinks foreign exposure is worthwhile, then it should pay, not Goldcorp, she said.

In the United States, elected officials are prohibited from taking virtually all trips paid by organizations that are actively lobbying Congress. The only exceptions are one-day event trips and visits to colleges and universities.

Last year, Canadian MPs went on more than 70 sponsored trips, often worth tens of thousand of dollars. Most were paid for by quasi-governmental or non-governmental organizations, including groups promoting closer ties with countries such as Israel, Taiwan and India.

Some MPs say they accept free travel because Parliament won't fund legitimate work, such as speaking at conferences or meeting foreign officials.

Nova Scotia Liberal MP Scott Brison flew on businessman Donald Sobey's jet to last year's World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Mr. Sobey is chairman emeritus of Halifax-based Empire Co. Ltd., which owns the Sobeys Inc. grocery chain and is one of the province's largest private-sector employers. Earlier this year, the Sobey and McCain families created Seafort Capital Inc., a private equity firm, naming Mr. Brison as its chairman.

Mr. Brison, who was invited to speak on a panel in Davos, said he paid for his own hotel and meals, but accepted the free flight (valued at $4,174), because Parliament doesn't cover the cost of what he considers important work. "If we agree that it's helpful for MPs to understand global issues and to represent Canada, there ought to be funds provided," Mr. Brison said in an interview.

Story continues below advertisement

He has a point. It's not the job of Goldcorp or the Sobeys to educate Canadian MPs.

The rules should make that clear.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies