Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Alberta Premier Alison Redford and Energy Minister Ken Hughes are pushing for the Keystone XL pipeline's approval.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

The Alberta government lauded Stephen Harper for hard-line remarks he made on TransCanada Corp.'s controversial Keystone XL pipeline proposal, with the province's energy minister saying he's "pleased to see the Prime Minister putting a stake in the sand."

On Thursday, Mr. Harper said arguments in favour of the proposed pipeline were "overwhelming," and vowed to continue his campaign to win approval for the project, which would bring crude from Alberta to refineries in Texas, until it succeeds.

"My view is that you don't take no for an answer," Mr. Harper told a New York business audience. "We haven't had that [from the U.S.], but if we were to get that, that won't be final. This won't be final until it's approved and we will keep pushing forward."

Story continues below advertisement

Debate between environmentalists, oil industry representatives and policymakers in the United States around Keystone XL focus on whether a green light from President Barack Obama on the project will lead to increased production, and thereby greenhouse gas emissions, from Alberta's oil sands.

Alberta Energy Minister Ken Hughes said it stands to reason for the Prime Minister to say that unfettered access to markets for Canadian oil products is "a national imperative" for a country that relies on its natural resource sector for tens of billions in government revenues. Mr. Hughes said the market access issue is not only a concern for oil-producing provinces such as Alberta or Saskatchewan, but is a Canada-wide issue.

"I'm pleased to see the Prime Minister putting a stake in the sand in that way," the Minister said in an interview Friday. "In diplomatic discussions, when a state says this is really important to us, and we cannot take no for an answer, that is an important message to the other side."

Mr. Hughes also said it's important for Americans to understand the benefits that Canadian oil will bring to their country. He pointed out that more than 80 pipelines already cross the U.S./Canada border, and the two countries' oil transportation systems are intertwined.

As part of his pitch for Canadian crude pipelines, Mr. Harper also told the U.S. audience: "If I were an American, the last thing I would want to see is Canada selling its oil anywhere else."

While the controversy over Keystone has raged in the U.S., both Ottawa and Alberta officials have pushed for the pipeline's approval through public speeches and diplomatic channels. Alberta Premier Alison Redford's tenure has sent cabinet-level trade missions to search for new markets beyond North America for the province's vast natural gas and oil resources. Mr. Hughes plans to travel to South Korea, China and Japan to meet with potential buyers next month.

"It's up to us to also ensure that we have access to global markets because we're at this critical juncture in the history of Western Canada where we now need to ensure that we have access to global markets, as opposed to just the North American continental market," he said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies