Skip to main content

A Kinder-Morgan employee makes his way past various pipes including crude oil pipeline leading from Alberta at the Kinder Morgan Westridge marine terminal in Burnaby, British Columbia, Sunday, July 8, 2012.

Rafal Gerszak For The Globe and Mail

The company behind a proposed pipeline expansion that would carry oil sands bitumen to British Columbia's Lower Mainland asked the Alberta government to help finance the project – a request that was rebuffed this week.

Kinder Morgan Inc. made the request last year in "high-level" talks with the province about its proposed Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, a provincial spokesman confirmed to The Globe and Mail. Alberta Energy Minister Diana McQueen this week told Kinder Morgan the province would not be backing the project.

"We are not moving forward with any financial arrangements with Kinder Morgan," Ms. McQueen's spokesman, Mike Feenstra, said in an e-mail, confirming "ideas were shared with the Alberta Government by Kinder Morgan about project financing options" in talks last year.

Story continues below advertisement

Lisa Clement, a spokeswoman for Kinder Morgan, said Wednesday and Thursday the company was not able to comment on the request to the provincial government, including whether the project is viable without government funding and how much money the company sought.

Alberta has been aggressively pressing for the approval of new or expanded pipelines, including Trans Mountain, Enbridge Inc.'s Northern Gateway and TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL, and has in the past subsidized other energy sector projects – in particular, a bitumen upgrader being built outside Edmonton.

In this case, Premier Alison Redford's government – which this week tabled its budget – balked at co-financing a project at a time when the province is borrowing billions and as pipelines are under immense regulatory and public scrutiny.

The talks between the province and Kinder Morgan didn't progress far enough for Kinder Morgan to specify what kind of financial support it was seeking, he added.

Through its "Bitumen Royalty in Kind" program, or BRIK, the Alberta government has supported the Sturgeon Refinery project, a bitumen upgrader that's under construction. Costs for the project have ballooned – to $8.5-billion – leading the province to step in with a $300-million loan in December of last year.

A spokesman for TransCanada said the company has never sought any form of financing from the province for Keystone XL, though government officials have regularly travelled to Washington to lobby for the project's approval. An Enbridge spokesman said the company also had not sought financial support from Alberta.

Kinder Morgan applied in December to the National Energy Board (NEB) to expand its existing Trans Mountain line, a 1,150-kilometre route between the Edmonton area and Burnaby, B.C. The $5.4-billion expansion would increase the pipeline's capacity from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day. If approved, the twinned pipeline would carry both light and heavy oil, including diluted bitumen from the Alberta oil sands.

Story continues below advertisement

The project faces opposition from environmental groups and First Nations leaders, while the mayors of Burnaby and Vancouver both oppose the project.

An estimated 2,300 people have applied to speak at NEB hearings on the proposed expansion, including more than 40 First Nations groups.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies