Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The Hydro-Quebec Eastmain 1A hydroelectric power plant in Eastmain, Que., on June 28, 2012.

Jacques Boissinot/The Canadian Press

The days of energy isolationism may be coming to an end for Ontario and Quebec. Canada's two largest power-consuming provinces, which have long followed their own paths when it comes to electricity, could soon join forces in an energy partnership that will pay dividends on both sides of the border. What's more, unlike the fallout from deals involving Alberta's oil sands, this one won't require building any new pipelines nor will it leave behind a huge carbon trail for future generations.

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne's recent pursuit of Quebec's surplus hydro power signals the overdue realization that Ontario's yearnings for energy self-sufficiency are a mug's game, at best. What matters to households and businesses is the cost of power, not its province of origin. Ontario has already wasted billions on natural gas-fired power plants that were never built and could potentially squander billions more refurbishing aging nuclear stations in a bid to prop up the province's atomic industry. Of course, that could just be throwing good money after bad, given it's been roughly 20 years since a country stepped up to buy a Candu.

The Ontario government has wisely put plans to refurbish its fleet of nuclear plants on hold for the time being. Over the next 15 years, though, it will have to overhaul some 8,500 megawatts of nuclear capacity. It's clearly not a decision that can be entered into lightly. The Darlington station alone will require a minimum of $13-billion in capital spending if it's going to continue to be in the province's medium-term power plans.

Story continues below advertisement

Ontarians already pay some of the highest electricity prices in the country. Importing power from Quebec is a much cheaper and more reliable option than continuing to depend on nuclear. Quebec's recent export deal with Vermont is at prices that are 30 per cent lower than what Ontario can expect to see if it decides to maintain its fleet of nuclear plants. And that's a best-case scenario. If history is any guide, you can double any estimates provided by the nuclear industry to find the price Ontario's electricity users will actually pay once the inevitable cost overruns start to pile up.

Ontario wouldn't be the only winner from an inter-provincial power deal. Quebec has an abundance of power to offer, but it also urgently needs to find new markets. Its traditional customers in the U.S. northeast are getting increasingly enamoured with natural gas and the long-term prospects for low-cost power that's part-and-parcel of the shale gas revolution.

Shale gas has proven to be a fierce competitor to Quebec's hydro industry in its key U.S. export markets. Thanks to new supply from shale formations, natural gas is not only abundant, but it's cheap too. In the last few years, Quebec has had to slash prices to remain competitive.

Ultimately, though, hydro is a tough option to beat in the energy game. Many natural gas producers are already questioning the economic viability of maintaining shale production at today's depressed commodity prices. If the industry decides to let off the throttle, less drilling and a more limited supply would send prices higher.

Hydro's nearly invisible carbon footprint is also a welcome sight for a warming planet. In a world that's becoming more conscious of carbon emissions, it's easy to see how hydro becomes that much more valuable, if only as an alternative to burning more coal.

Hydro power is far and away the most significant source of renewable energy in the world, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of global electricity generation. Unlike other renewable options, such as solar, hydro also doesn't need any market-skewing government policies, like feed-in tariffs, to make it cost effective.

Canada's spot as a world leader in hydro also shouldn't be overlooked. Hydroelectric power accounts for more than 60 per cent of our country's electricity generation. Some 475 hydroelectric power stations scattered across the country produce more than 370 terawatts of power every year. It's an amount that's second only to China.

Story continues below advertisement

According to the Canadian Hydropower Association, Canada still has enough hydro capacity to more than double current output. By one estimate, Quebec alone has the potential to develop another 40,000 megawatts of hydroelectric power. To put that in context, Alberta's total power generation capacity currently stands at around 14,000 megawatts.

A Quebec-Ontario power accord could be the catalyst for developing some of that untapped hydro potential. For all of the uproar about the oil sands, in a carbon-constrained world, hydro may yet become Canada's most valuable source of energy.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies