Skip to main content

Barrick Gold Corp. has struck a deal with the indigenous groups that opposed the company's mothballed Pascua Lama project. But the miner must still overcome huge obstacles before it can resume developing the massive gold and silver deposit in the Andes.

The mountaintop project on the border between Chile and Argentina has been put on hold indefinitely while Toronto-based Barrick waits for market conditions to improve.

The company's mismanagement of Pascua Lama pushed costs up to $8.5-billion as the gold market soured, forcing Barrick to halt construction late last year in order to conserve cash.

Story continues below advertisement

Although Barrick is nowhere close to restarting the South American project, the company said Wednesday that it had reached an initial agreement in April with 15 Diaguita communities in Chile.

Barrick said it will share technical and environmental information about Pascua Lama with the indigenous groups as well as provide funding for any independent analysis.

"We believe this agreement will form the basis of a new relationship with Diaguita communities, one based on transparency, openness and trust," Barrick spokesman Andy Lloyd said in an e-mailed statement. "Earning that trust will take time, and it will require consistent engagement and commitment," he said.

The initial agreement is a positive step for Barrick and could eventually make it easier for the company to build the mine. The company has recorded nearly $6-billion (U.S.) in writedowns related to Pascua Lama and has been hit by lawsuits from investors alleging that the company misled them about the project.

Over the past few years, the Diaguita people took Barrick to court in an attempt to stop the mine. Their lawyer told a local radio station in Chile on Wednesday that "the communities have not renounced any legal action," according to Reuters.

In addition to waiting for better economic conditions and higher precious metal prices, the company must finish building a water management system and resolve other legal issues before it can move ahead with the mine.

"If gold price doesn't go up a fair bit more here, we are not going to restart construction," Barrick chief executive officer Jamie Sokalsky said in a recent interview.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Sokalsky said the price of gold needs to increase to about $1,500 an ounce and silver to about $25 an ounce for Pascua Lama to be viable. The yellow and silver metals are currently trading below $1,300 and $20 respectively.

With more than 15 million ounces of gold reserves, Pascua Lama had been one of Barrick's key projects. The company, the world's largest gold producer, is now focused on producing profitable ounces instead of churning out gold at any cost.

Asked whether the company would consider selling Pascua Lama if market conditions fail to improve, Mr. Sokalsky said that was not in the cards.

"Bringing in some additional investment would be something that we would consider," he said. "We would not consider an outright sale of Pascua Lama. Once in operation, it will be one of the best gold mines in the world."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies