Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A truck waits for ore at a Newmont Mining operation.

STAFF/Reuters

A spat between Barrick Gold Corp. and Newmont Mining Corp. erupted into a public war of words, with the companies accusing each other of ruining their $13-billion (U.S.) merger.

Barrick said its American rival reneged on their deal and tried to change key provisions, including the location of the head office in Toronto.

Newmont disagreed with Barrick's version and faulted the Canadian company's incoming chairman John Thornton for not being constructive.

Story continues below advertisement

Over the years, the world's two largest gold producers have made several attempts to unite and cut expenses in Nevada, where they both own multiple mines.

The slump in the gold industry fuelled their latest merger ambitions, with the companies identifying about $1-billion in cost savings.

But they ultimately could not overcome two decades of personality clashes and cultural differences, which exploded into the public domain on Monday and likely killed any future merger discussions.

"It has become evident to us over the past several weeks that the type of constructive, mutually respectful and partnership-oriented relationship necessary to realize the potential benefits of that combination does not yet exist," Newmont's chairman Vincent Calarco said in an April 25 letter to Barrick's board and Mr. Thornton, posted on Newmont's website Monday. "Our efforts to find consensus have been rejected out of hand repeatedly."

The Colorado-based company cast most of the blame on Mr. Thornton, a former Goldman Sachs executive who is currently Barrick's co-chairman. It was also angered when Barrick's founder Peter Munk, who is due to retire as the miner's chairman on Wednesday, told the Financial Post that Newmont was extremely bureaucratic and unfriendly to shareholders.

"None of this suggests that we have the mutual respect or shared values today," the Newmont letter said.

Barrick said that the companies had signed a term sheet April 8, only to see Newmont back out of the three key elements of the deal: a Toronto-headquartered company, the composition of the combined company and the roles of the chairman, chief executive officer and lead director.

Story continues below advertisement

Under the terms of their latest proposal, Newmont's chief executive officer Gary Goldberg would have become CEO of the combined entity, Newmont's Mr. Calarco would have become vice-chairman and lead independent director, and Barrick's incoming chairman Mr. Thornton would have become executive chairman, sources had said.

The North American miners, which would have been called Barrick Newmont Mining, were getting ready to announce their deal ahead of Newmont's annual shareholder meeting April 23, sources said.

But talks broke down over which assets would have been spun off and Newmont wanted Mr. Thornton to assume the role of chairman, a position that would have stripped away some of his powers as executive chairman, sources said.

In the letter, Newmont said Mr. Thornton told the company twice that their merger process was "dead."

Mr. Thornton then sent Mr. Calarco an e-mail last week asking the American company to resume formal talks. But talks at the highest levels were not rekindled.

Barrick said in a statement that it still "believes the interests of shareholders are best served through the completion of this business combination."

Story continues below advertisement

Newmont's surprising public criticism of Mr. Thornton comes as the former banker gets ready to become Barrick's sole executive chairman.

Mr. Thornton spent his year as co-chairman listening to shareholder concerns and helping to improve the company's corporate governance, including its executive compensation arrangements. But in a blow to Barrick's efforts, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board said it would vote against the miner's new pay schemes and cited concerns over Mr. Thornton's compensation.

A Barrick spokesman said the company has "received strong shareholder support" for its new executive compensation program and cited the support of two influential proxy advisory firms.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies