Skip to main content

Douglas Channel, the proposed terminus for an oil pipeline in Enbridge’s Northern Gateway project, is pictured in an aerial view in Kitimat, B.C., on Jan. 10, 2012.

DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

A joint British Columbia-Alberta government working group focused on getting Western Canadian oil and natural gas to Asian markets says progress on issues such as spill prevention, First Nations engagement and sharing the economic benefits will come this year or early next, according to a report prepared for Premiers Christy Clark and Alison Redford.

The document – marked as "strictly confidential" but released to reporters in B.C. and Alberta on Monday – speaks mostly in broad generalities about the work to date and provides little in the way of specific plans. But it does lay out some timelines for progress, guiding principles, plans for creating a "world-class" marine and terrestrial spill regime, and notes the two provinces need to enter into negotiations with Ottawa regarding the "financing" for the infrastructure improvements to highways, ports and airports needed to gain access to Asia-Pacific markets.

The report talks about developing "broad social acceptance" of projects by being more responsive to those with environmental concerns, using tools such as social media and addressing "misinformation" about natural resource sector growth. It reiterates that Alberta's oil and gas royalties are not on the table for negotiation when it comes to getting economic benefits to British Columbians, but the B.C. government has the right to negotiate with industry.

Story continues below advertisement

"Ultimately, the work being done today will help us to fulfill our shared commitment to create jobs, stimulate long-term growth and to position Canada as a true energy superpower," said the December report.

Public concern in B.C. over the safety and environmental risks of oil-sands pipelines – particularly spills on land or off the West Coast – prompted Ms. Clark in 2012 to lay out five conditions related to the environment, First Nations consultation and financial benefits in order to support oil-pipeline development in the province.

In November, 2013, Ms. Clark and Alberta's Ms. Redford said their two provinces had reached a framework for an agreement to satisfy B.C.'s demands, and had established a joint working group to work out the details. In the December report from public servants in both provinces, the document said the benefits of the oil and gas industry extends to all Canadians but B.C. faces "risks" that Alberta does not.

Of particular concern to B.C. residents is the proposed 1,177-kilometre Northern Gateway pipeline. If built, the Enbridge Inc. pipeline would bring oil-sands bitumen to Kitimat, B.C., from Bruderheim, Alta. In December, an independent body mandated by the federal Environment Minister and the National Energy Board – the joint review panel – gave a conditional green light to the project. That recommendation will inform a federal cabinet decision to come in the first half of this year as to whether to give final approval to the project.

However, it was only last May that the B.C. government formally rejected the proposed 525,000-barrel-a-day pipeline, telling the federal panel conducting hearings on the project that the company has failed to adequately explain how to deal with a major heavy oil spill on land or in coastal waters.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter