Skip to main content

Lelu Island is the proposed site for the Pacific NorthWest LNG export terminal. The federal environmental agency began its review of the Petronas-led project in April, 2013, and the much-delayed assessment is slated to stretch into September.

www.lonniewishart.com

A tentative deal between a B.C. First Nations group and a major liquefied natural gas venture shows that even long-stalled energy projects have a glimmer of hope to win over opponents.

Thirteen months ago, the Lax Kw'alaams issued a scathing report that accused the Petronas-led Pacific NorthWest LNG project of ignoring aboriginal concerns about salmon habitat in northwestern British Columbia.

But this week, the First Nations group took long strides toward resolving differences by unveiling an agreement with Pacific NorthWest LNG, TransCanada Corp. and the B.C. government. Pacific NorthWest LNG, led by Malaysia's state-owned Petronas, is backing the bulk of the $1.15-billion benefits package aimed at winning aboriginal consent for building an $11.4-billion LNG export terminal on Lelu Island.

Story continues below advertisement

The Lax Kw'alaams have lingering worries about salmon habitat in Flora Bank, located next to the proposed LNG site near Prince Rupert.

Pacific NorthWest LNG is offering $1-billion in cash over 40 years to the Lax Kw'alaams while the B.C. government is proposing to transfer 2,200 hectares of Crown lands, valued at $108-million, in the Prince Rupert harbour region to the aboriginal group.

The tentative pact, which will be voted on with a show of hands by band members starting on Monday and ending May 12, sets a new standard for sharing the benefits of major projects. The deal sets a high bar for garnering First Nations' consent for resource proposals in British Columbia, where most of the land base is still subject to native land claims and many energy-related projects are stalled as a result of aboriginal opposition.

Since blanket solutions are elusive, each project must be examined on a case-by-case basis, said Art Sterritt, executive director of the Coastal First Nations. "This is not oil – an accident with an LNG tanker is not going to destroy the coast, and Lax Kw'alaams people know that. It's not going to wipe out the whole culture and economy," Mr. Sterritt said in an interview Friday. "From my perspective, the vote has probably got a better than 50-50 chance of passing."

In the case of Pacific NorthWest LNG, the joint venture is promising skills training and jobs for qualified members of the Tsimshian, which includes the Lax Kw'alaams, Metlakatla, Kitsumkalum, Kitselas, Gitxaala and Gitga'at. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency consulted with those native groups, but four others have complained of inadequate consultation. The aboriginal-backed Skeena Fisheries Commission sees threats to salmon habitat.

The federal environmental agency began its review of the Petronas-led project in April, 2013, and the much-delayed assessment is slated to stretch into September.

Lax Kw'alaams leaders acknowledge that there remain unanswered questions about Pacific NorthWest LNG's environmental impact, but they opted to take the 40-year pact proposal to the 3,600 members to let them debate the merits of the LNG terminal and TransCanada's Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline plan.

Story continues below advertisement

Aboriginal opposition has been a key stumbling block as the energy industry clamours to tap richer global markets from Canada's West Coast.

Russ Girling, chief executive officer of TransCanada, declined comment about the Petronas deal with the Lax Kw'alaams.

The company is negotiating with dozens of aboriginal communities along two proposed pipeline corridors in British Columbia, offering construction jobs and "enduring economic benefits" associated with the projects, he said after TransCanada's annual meeting in Calgary.

Each agreement is tailored specifically to meet local needs, an approach the company plans to repeat as it tries to build support for its $12-billion Energy East pipeline to Canada's East Coast, he said. "I think you have to take into account the unique circumstances of each individual community," Mr. Girling said. "Do they have unsettled land-claim issues, and how do you deal with those things?"

He added there is a "high probability" that the Petronas-led group will make a final investment decision on the LNG export terminal by the middle of this year. Some industry experts say it will take until September for Pacific NorthWest LNG to give the final go-ahead on construction or decide to postpone.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story continues below advertisement

Aboriginal group: Lax Kw'alaams

Location: Prince Rupert region

Members: 3,600 people in multiple B.C. locations

Proposals being voted on: Petronas-led Pacific NorthWest LNG export terminal on Lelu Island and TransCanada's Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline plan. Lax Kw'alaams being offered $1-billion in cash over 40 years, plus title to a portion of B.C.'s coastal lands in exchange for consenting to projects.

Purpose of upcoming meetings: "There will be presentations from Lax Kw'alaams advisers about the environmental risks of the two projects and about the benefits offered by the proponents and the province if Lax Kw'alaams supports the projects. The project proponents will also give presentations about the projects. Community members will be given an opportunity to ask questions and seek clarification about the projects and associated impacts and benefits," according to Lax Kw'alaams bulletin to members.

LNG meeting locations and dates: Lax Kw'alaams, May 4-5; Prince Rupert, May 6-7; Vancouver, May 11-12.

Story continues below advertisement

Decision after voting with show of hands: "After the community meetings have been held, and members have provided their views on the two projects by way of a vote, Lax Kw'alaams leadership will carefully consider the feedback from membership and make a decision to either support or oppose the Pacific NorthWest LNG facility and the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline project," according to the bulletin.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies