Skip to main content

Replacement pipe is stored near crude oil storage tanks at Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Pipeline terminal in Kamloops, B.C.

CHRIS HELGREN/REUTERS

The future of key resource projects in British Columbia has been thrown into disarray after a squeaker in the provincial election left the BC Liberals politically weakened.

BC Liberal Premier Christy Clark's reduced mandate will place pressure on her to appeal to BC Green supporters as she tries to fend off the opposition BC NDP, according to political observers and environmentalists.

While the final seat count has yet to be determined, a BC Liberal minority government means that Ms. Clark will need to re-examine her party's positions on items such as proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects, the planned expansion of Kinder Morgan Inc.'s Trans Mountain oil pipeline and the Site C Dam already under construction.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: B.C. limbo: Christy Clark seeks to co-operate with political rivals

"On Kinder Morgan, alarm bells are going off in Ottawa and in Alberta. Alberta and the federal Liberals have to be nervous about this," said Norman Ruff, an associate professor emeritus at the University of Victoria.

The Liberals won 43 seats in Tuesday's provincial election, outpacing the NDP's 41 seats, while potentially leaving the Green Party holding the balance of power with victories in three ridings. "Ms. Clark is going to have to be a very good listener," Mr. Ruff said in an interview Wednesday.

On coal, the Liberals have already found common ground with environmentalists.

Midway through the campaign, Ms. Clark asked Ottawa to impose a ban on exports of U.S. and Canadian thermal coal from B.C. ports.

If Ottawa doesn't take heed, the BC Liberals pledge to impose a hefty $70-a-tonne carbon tax on exports of thermal coal – a commodity that goes into coal-fired plants to generate electricity.

The Green Party supports the proposed coal ban, but it wants the province's existing carbon tax to be increased, and also to expand what is subject to that environmental levy.

Story continues below advertisement

In her April 26 letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ms. Clark linked her request for a ban on thermal coal exports to the Trump administration's decision to slap duties of up to 24.12 per cent on Canadian softwood lumber shipments south of the border.

Whether it's exporting LNG, oil or coal, "the Liberals need to pay more attention to the support in B.C. for taking action against climate change." said Josha MacNab, B.C. director of the Pembina Institute, a clean-energy think tank. "Even if the Liberals form a majority, there are things that British Columbians are unhappy about, and certainly one of those is the current approach to climate change."

During the campaign, the NDP and Green Party criticized the Liberals for their oft-repeated promise to jump-start an LNG industry in the province. Ms. Clark heavily touted LNG's economic prospects during the 2013 provincial election. But the Greens oppose LNG exports while the NDP has major concerns, especially ecological worries about Pacific NorthWest LNG's plans to build a liquefaction plant on Lelu Island in northwestern British Columbia.

Under Ms. Clark, the Liberal government has essentially given its blessing to the expansion of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain oil pipeline, although mayors in Burnaby and Vancouver promise to block it by withholding construction permits.

NDP Leader John Horgan pledged to use "every tool in the toolbox" to prevent the company from completing construction. Andrew Weaver's Green Party also opposes the Kinder Morgan project that would increase shipments of Alberta bitumen piped across British Columbia.

The voting results on Tuesday prompted Alberta NDP Premier Rachel Notley to issue a statement on Wednesday that names all three B.C. political leaders. "I look forward to working with them on what they have all described as a desire for change and a new way of governing B.C.," Ms. Notley said.

Story continues below advertisement

The BC Liberals hope to wrest one seat from the BC NDP in the closely contested Courtenay-Comox riding, where absentee ballots will be tallied in a couple of weeks. The NDP won Courtenay-Comox by just nine votes.

"A weakened Christy Clark is probably going to cause concern for Trans Mountain because it raises the prospect of uncertainty and more focus on the project," said Alan Ross, managing partner for law firm Borden Ladner Gervais in Calgary.

He said the federal government has paramountcy in approving interprovincial pipelines, and Kinder Morgan has that approval in hand.

"There doesn't appear to be much in the way of legal or procedural tools in a toolbox for the next complexion of a B.C. government to preclude the Trans Mountain project from proceeding," Mr. Ross said in an interview. "It becomes more of a soapbox than a toolbox for B.C. political leaders to attack the Kinder Morgan project."

One regulatory lawyer said provinces and municipalities have an obligation to issue permits where the federal government has given its approval for a project under its jurisdiction, but can seek to impose delays or conditions that frustrate a proponent.

Federal Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said the combined popular support for the BC NDP and provincial Greens makes it clear that there is widespread opposition to Kinder Morgan's project, as well as BC Hydro's planned $8.8-billion Site C Dam in northeastern British Columbia.

Story continues below advertisement

She disagreed with Mr. Ross's assessment of Trans Mountain.

"Does the province have the levers to stop the project? Yes," Ms. May said. "In a constitutional showdown, the province has levers. The pipeline can't be built without a whole slew of provincial permits."

Want to interact with other informed Canadians and Globe journalists? Join our exclusive Globe and Mail subscribers Facebook group

Report on Business columnist Andrew Willis discusses the recent Cenovus and ConocoPhillips deal and Warren Buffett's strategy on share buybacks The Globe and Mail
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter