Skip to main content

John Watson, CEO of Chevron Corp., speaks in Perth, Australia last Tuesday. Chevron is leading a carbon capture and storage (CCS) project at a liquefied natural gas development on Barrow Island.

Aaron Bunch/Bloomberg

The idea that significant amounts of greenhouse gases can be buried underground will be tested soon at a remote island off northwest Australia, where oil companies led by Chevron Corp. are poised to inject pollutants two kilometres into the Earth's crust.

The $2-billion carbon capture and storage (CCS) project at Barrow Island about 60 kilometres off the coast will be the biggest of its kind when it starts by next year. It's part of the gigantic Gorgon liquefied natural gas development, which began production last month after $54-billion (U.S.) of investment and will run for four decades.

CCS plants are seen by some as having the potential to hold back one-seventh of the emissions reductions the International Energy Agency says are needed to keep the planet from overheating. While the Barrow CCS project will be a milestone for the effort to sequester greenhouse gases, it also highlights the difficulties of the technology. It wouldn't have happened without the government pushing it, stepping in with $60-million (Australian) in funds and vowing to assume long-term liability should any of the gas escape.

Story continues below advertisement

"It doesn't happen without the government doing something," said Tony Wood, director of the energy program at the Grattan Institute research group in Melbourne and a former adviser to governments in the region on clean-energy technologies at the Clinton Foundation. "You can either put in place a carbon price, throw money at it as a government or you can regulate it. In this case, they effectively chose the third."

The Western Australian government insisted on Barrow CCS as a condition of approving Gorgon, whose developers also include oil majors Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC. When the investment decision was made in 2009, the government was planning to introduce a carbon trading system that would have underpinned the economics of the project. The development will inject as much as 4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year into the Earth's crust at Barrow Island, reducing Gorgon's emissions by 40 per cent.

"It is still early days for these types of projects, and they are costly," John Watson, Chevron's chief executive, told reporters in Perth on April 12. "So the ultimate application of these technologies will be their competitiveness."

The number of large carbon capture facilities operating may rise to 22 by next year from 15, according to the Global CCS Institute, an industry group that seeks to encourage development of the technology. Another nine projects are in advanced stages of planning. New facilities are scheduled to begin in the United States, Canada and Abu Dhabi.

"As much as many may feel that it would be best to simply stop using fossil fuels, the fact is that it's not practical, it's not going to happen, and if you want to work in the real world you've got to deal with emissions," said Brad Page, chief executive officer of the CCS Institute.

Still, CCS is too expensive for widescale use without government support. New projects need a carbon price of at least $60 (U.S.) to work economically, Shell's CEO Ben van Beurden said last year.

That's more than five times the carbon price in Alberta, where Shell started a CCS project in November. The $1.35-billion (Canadian) Quest plant will extract and store about 1 million tonnes a year of carbon from Shell's Scotford refinery, a first in North America. About half of the cost was paid by Alberta.

Story continues below advertisement

In a setback for CCS, the U.K. government, which has been promoting the technology as an offset for North Sea oil and gas, scrapped a ($2-billion) competition last year.

It's hard to see many new projects in the future unless governments implement stronger climate policies, said Howard Herzog, a senior research engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Energy Initiative.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.