Skip to main content

On Northern Gateway, CEO Brian Ferguson said potential shippers such as Cenovus are still behind the project.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

Cenovus Energy Inc. chief executive Brian Ferguson says his company needs every major pipeline project on the drawing board, along with rail, to allow it to transport its growing oil sands production.

Speaking at the TD Securities Calgary Energy Conference on Tuesday, he said he remains firmly committed to the $7.9-billion Northern Gateway project approved by the federal government last month. The proposed pipeline, which would move 525,000 barrels of Alberta oil sands bitumen and other crudes each day through northern B.C., to the Pacific and then through coastal waters in supertankers, still faces stiff opposition in British Columbia from First Nations and other communities.

Mr. Ferguson's comments stand in contrast to recent predictions from some analysts who have said that at least one or two of the proposed pipelines – beset by regulatory delays and facing environmental critics – will not be needed to ship increasing oil production in the next 10 years, and will not be built.

Story continues below advertisement

But Mr. Ferguson said increasing oil production means producers need more ways to transport their oil.

"We need all of the market access – east, south and to the West Coast," Mr. Ferguson said in a speech where he shared the stage with TransCanada Corp. chief executive Russ Girling.

"I'm one of the producers that is actually supporting all of those four pipeline projects, and we're also planning on expanding rail," he later told reporters.

Mr. Ferguson was referring to four proposed projects: Northern Gateway, TransCanada's Keystone XL project through the U.S. to the Gulf Coast, Energy East – the 4,600-kilometre pipeline will carry 1.1-million barrels of crude oil per day from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries in Eastern Canada – and Kinder Morgan's planned expansion of its Trans Mountain pipeline.

On Northern Gateway, Mr. Ferguson said potential shippers such as Cenovus are still behind the project. It's an important project "not just for our industry but obviously for the country. We're most definitely behind it."

The need for additional transport capacity, by pipeline or rail, is not likely to diminish. Oil sands production is expected to roughly double in the next 10 years, hitting 4.5 million barrels of oil a day by 2025 compared with 1.8 million barrels a day in 2012. Mr. Girling said transport by rail, especially for trans-continential distances, is more expensive and difficult. However, he believes the amount oil being shipped on tracks will go up if constraints on pipeline capacity remain.

"If the world price of oil is $100 a barrel, we'll figure out how to get it to market," Mr. Girling said.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Ferguson also took aim at NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair and Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, saying he doesn't understand the federal opposition leaders vocal resistance to the Northern Gateway pipeline, even after the project has been approved by the National Energy Board, with 209 conditions.

"To me it just doesn't feel right as a Canadian that people who aspire to be the prime minister of the country would say that they would just abandon and make a mockery of our regulatory system," Mr. Ferguson told reporters.

"I don't think that's the right approach for them to be taking."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter