Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Cenovus Energy Inc. has lowered its 2015 capital budget to between $1.8 billion and $2 billion, which is about $700 million less than the previous estimate and more than 15 per cent below last year's spending levels. Cenovus chief executive Brian Ferguson says he believes crude oil prices will rebound, but the timing is uncertain.

Larry MacDougal/The Canadian Press

Cenovus Energy Inc. slashed $700-million from its 2015 budget and shelved two more of its oil sands expansion projects, joining a growing list of major energy companies putting off spending in northern Alberta in reaction to sliding crude prices.

The Calgary oil producer on Wednesday revised its budget for the current year to $1.8-billion and $2-billion, following a move just last month to cut 2015 spending by 15 per cent.

Cenovus is in the middle of expansions at its Christina Lake and Foster Creek oil sands operations, but subsequent expansions at those projects have been put on hold. The company is also cancelling the "bulk" of its conventional drilling plans in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, oil prices slumped again Wednesday, falling to the lowest close since March, 2009. The U.S. benchmark West Texas intermediate traded at $44.45 (U.S.) a barrel, down $1.78, as U.S. oil inventories climbed sharply amid a global oversupply.

At current oil prices, even established oil sands projects are struggling to make money. As a result, companies are pulling back spending on future, higher-cost projects and taking other steps to curtail near-term production.

Suncor Energy Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. also cut their budgets and deferred expansion plans in the oil sands this month. But Cenovus's cuts extend beyond northern Alberta. Its decision to axe its conventional drilling plan comes as January's rig count in Canada is on track to hit a 15-year low. Cenovus also said it will make job cuts.

"I believe crude oil prices will rebound, but the timing is uncertain," Brian Ferguson, the company's chief executive, said in a statement. "We're taking the actions we deem prudent to help protect the financial resilience of Cenovus without compromising our future."

Cenovus' revised budget predicts its cash flow will total between $1.3-billion and $1.5-billion this year, assuming West Texas Intermediate oil trades at an average of $50.50 a barrel in 2015.

Randy Ollenberger, an energy analyst at the Bank of Montreal, notes Cenvous's expected cash flow is below its capital budget if calculated using the market's current long-term futures prices for oil. And this, he says, is before adding in the $800-million a year the company pays in dividends. Cenovus did not cut its dividend.

Brett Harris, a spokesman for the Calgary-based company, said Cenovus could make the difference a number of ways: using cash it has on the balance sheet; dipping into its credit facility; finding a buyer for its royalty-free property; and cutting its budget further.

Story continues below advertisement

Menno Hulshof, an analyst at Toronto-Dominion Bank, says the price of oil is now lower than what some established oil sands projects need to break even on the oil they produce today.

Oil must be worth at least $50.03 a barrel in order for Cenovus to break even on the crude it now produces at Christina Lake and $50.59 a barrel at Foster Creek, he said. (This excludes costs such as taxes, reclamation and general and administrative expenses). Suncor's Firebag and MacKay operations need oil to be worth $50.59 a barrel to break even, while CNRL's Primrose project requires oil at $47.03 a barrel, according to Mr. Hulshof. All of these projects use wells rather than mines to extract bitumen.

Cenovus's new budget will also amplify pain outside the oil sands. The Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors says there were 353 rigs operating Tuesday, down 38 per cent from this time last year. The drop means only 44 per cent of the country's entire drilling fleet is being used right now. Analysts at Raymond James predict January's overall rig count will clock in at about 390, down 30 per cent from last year.

"This will be both the lowest January rig count in Canada since 1999 and the most substantially negative" year-over-year comparison for January since the firm began tracking the data in 1995.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies