Skip to main content

Barrick Gold’s Pascua-Lama mine site in the Andes on the Chilean-Argentine border. Canadian gold mining executives are obsessed with the concept of bigness. The problem with bigness is that it translates into trouble when it’s extended to corporate development. Big projects are big gambles.

Barrick Gold

Chile's environmental regulator has halted development of Barrick Gold Corp.'s $8.5-billion (U.S.) Pascua-Lama mine, dealing a fresh blow to the embattled project that is key to the growth plans of the world's largest gold miner.

The Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (SMA) cited "very serious violations" by Toronto-based Barrick and ordered the company to take "urgent measures" to complete a water management system to prevent contamination around the mine site. The regulator also fined Barrick $16-million.

"There were some reporting requirements that we hadn't fully complied with and there were aspects of the water management system which were not fully completed on time," Barrick spokesman Andy Lloyd said in an interview Friday. "Those were the types of things that the fine is for, but they didn't fine us for polluting."

Story continues below advertisement

Barrick acknowledged that certain components of the project deviated from construction plans. "The company is in the process of reviewing the SMA resolution in detail. Barrick is fully committed to complying with all aspects of the resolution and to operating at the highest environmental standards," a company statement added.

Friday's move by the Chilean regulator comes on top of a preliminary court injunction last month that suspended construction on the Chile side of the project, which straddles the Chile-Argentina border, owing to environmental concerns raised by indigenous communities. Last year Barrick sharply raised the estimated cost of Pascua-Lama to more than $8-billion and delayed development by a year.

The series of setbacks could prompt Barrick to take a hard look at the wisdom of proceeding with Pascua-Lama, at least in the short term, analysts said.

With gold prices slumping, Pascua-Lama is looking increasingly like a project that doesn't make economic sense, said George Topping, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus Canada. "Barrick has a highly levered balance sheet … and it's probably going to have to spend another $3.5-billion on Pascua-Lama," Mr. Topping said. from Toronto.

Barrick reported debt of $14.8-billion as of March 31.

"What happens if gold prices fall further?" Mr. Topping continued. "The Chilean regulator's decision could represent a good opportunity for Barrick to delay the project to let it focus on the balance sheet for the time being. The gold-and-silver deposit will still be there in a couple of years, and the company could come back to it if it's put on ice."

Mr. Topping noted there are political risks in Argentina because the government there could decide that it wants a formula for greater tax revenue to flow into its own treasury. Work on the Pascua-Lama processing plant on the Argentine side continues, but until Barrick meets the Chilean environmental agency's demands to protect water supplies, the open-pit mine in Chile faces a future in limbo.

Story continues below advertisement

Vancouver-based Silver Wheaton Corp. in 2009 agreed with Barrick to acquire 25 per cent of the mine's silver production during the project's lifetime.

"We remain confident in Barrick's ability to develop Pascua-Lama into one of the world's great gold-silver mines," Silver Wheaton president Randy Smallwood said in a statement. "We remain confident in Barrick's commitment to this project, and look forward to seeing this issue resolved. Silver Wheaton looks forward to a long-term partnership with Barrick on Pascua-Lama."

The Pascua-Lama project in the Andes mountains reaches over the Chilean border into Argentina. There are an estimated 17.9 million ounces of proven and probable gold reserves, as well as 676 million ounces of silver in the deposit. The large project is a key piece of Barrick's plan to boost gold production in the years ahead.

Mr. Topping said that if Barrick were to defer $3.5-billion in construction costs, it would provide some much-needed breathing room, especially with the company seeking ways to address a potential financial squeeze should gold prices continue to slide.

Barrick did not say how long it expects to take to meet the SMA's requirements for water management.

With files from reporter Jacqueline Nelson in Toronto

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter