Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Peter Munk, founder and chairman of Barrick Gold, in front of a map pointing out the Pascua-Lama project during the miner’s annual general meeting in Toronto in April.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

Chile's President says Barrick Gold Corp. must follow 23 steps to comply with orders from his country's environmental regulator, a message that underscores the tough road ahead for the company to get its crucial Pascua-Lama gold project back on track.

Sebastian Pinera, in Ottawa to discuss Canada-Chile economic relations, admonished Barrick for its handling of the $8.5-billion (U.S.) mine development so far.

"The company didn't comply with all the conditions that were established in that environmental impact assessment," Mr. Pinera said during a joint news conference with Prime Minister Stephen Harper. "We have identified 23 areas where they will have to improve their behaviour with respect to the environment in Chile."

Story continues below advertisement

Last Friday, Chile's environmental regulator halted development of the gold and silver mine, citing "very serious violations" by Barrick.

Mr. Pinera said Chile wants Barrick to eventually proceed with its Pascua-Lama mine – as long as it obeys environmental rules.

But lengthy delays are likely for the project, due to the time likely required for Toronto-based Barrick to carry out environmental fixes, including canals to divert run-off water away from the Chilean mine.

The Chilean regulator told Reuters on Thursday that it will take one or two years for Barrick to put the proper water management and drainage systems in place.

TD Securities Inc. analyst Greg Barnes forecasts that first production from Pascua-Lama is still possible in late 2015, or a one-year delay from industry expectations for a targeted start in late 2014. But if Barrick were to voluntarily choose to temporarily stop the project for two years, it would be hugely disruptive to the world's largest gold producer, he said.

"It would be expensive to suspend. It would annoy the regulator and the government, and you would lose the momentum on the project," Mr. Barnes said, adding that Barrick's decision will be influenced by its internal predictions of whether gold prices will slump further or recover.

Mr. Barnes said Barrick management will have tough decisions to make in the months ahead, including whether to slow down spending on the Pascua-Lama venture or even consider cancellation, although he considers the prospect of walking away to be a long shot.

Story continues below advertisement

The half-built project is located in the Andes mountains and reaches over the Chilean border into Argentina. While work on the Chilean open-pit mine has been suspended, construction continues on the processing plant on the Argentine side.

Mr. Pinera said he is counting on Barrick to comply with Chile's "environmental legislation and procedures and standards," adding that he hopes "the investment will be able to continue and it will be very important because this is an investment which is done in the high mountains, very close to the frontiers with Chile and Argentina."

Barrick spokesman Andy Lloyd said Thursday that the company continues to evaluate the regulator's order and examine "the work required to achieve compliance. Barrick is fully committed to complying with all aspects of project's environmental permit and to operating at the highest environmental standards."

While Barrick declined to outline the steps required to restart Pascua-Lama's construction on the Chilean side, the company acknowledged that certain components of the project deviated from construction plans and fell short of requirements for environmental approvals.

Industry observers say the 23 items relate to addressing concerns raised by indigenous groups, environmentalists and farmers who are worried about downstream water contamination. But Barrick has stressed that a $16-million fine levied against it by the regulator last Friday was for administrative breaches and not actual pollution.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies