Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Corn shortage forces trade-off between food and ethanol

Gary Johnson walks through a field of milo sorghum on his farm in Waukomis, Okla., on Aug. 15, 2012. The government is on the verge of approving sorghum, a grain mainly used as livestock feed, to make a cleaner version of ethanol.

Sue Ogrocki/Associated Press

To supporters, ethanol is a wonder fuel – clean, renewable and cheap.

Well, scratch cheap from the list of attributes.

Historically, it is true that ethanol has been less expensive than gasoline. But not this year. Ethanol is now on the verge of becoming the more expensive fuel, based on recent benchmark New York Harbor prices.

Story continues below advertisement

Blame it on corn, the ingredient of choice for making ethanol in North America. Towering corn stalks typically dominate the midsummer landscape across the farm belt, but not this year, as a devastating drought threatens to wipe out as much as a quarter of the U.S. corn crop. Ontario officials say 10 to 20 per cent of the province's crop may be ruined.

That has sent the corn futures soaring to near record highs in recent weeks, pushing up the price of everything it is used for, including ethanol and animal feed, and creating havoc throughout the global food chain.

The price spike is also raising some awkward questions about the wisdom of Canadian and U.S. rules that require refiners to blend ethanol into their gasoline.

If there is not enough corn to go around, where should it go – food, feed or fuel?

Roughly 40 per cent of the U.S. corn crop now goes to ethanol, and the share increases every year, amplifying price pressures when the market is tight. The rest of the U.S. crop goes to food, animal feed and various industrial uses. And because the U.S. is a major global corn exporter, the drought is making food more expensive everywhere.

Barack Obama is under pressure to scrap the ethanol mandate in the face of the extreme conditions – the worst to hit the farm belt since the early 1950s. Cattle ranchers, poultry producers and food producers have all asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to suspend the mandate until corn prices ease. Similarly, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations recently appealed to the Obama administration for relief after the agency's food index shot up 6 per cent in July.

"An immediate, temporary suspension of that mandate would give some respite to the market and allow more of the crop to be channelled toward food and feed uses," the FAO's Brazilian director-general, Jose Graziano da Silva, pleaded in a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times.

Story continues below advertisement

Reaction has been surprisingly muted in Canada, where a two-year-old federal mandate requires that refiners blend at least 5 per cent renewable fuel into gasoline supplies. Several provinces impose additional regional mandates, including Ontario and British Columbia. The United States imposed a 10-per-cent mandate five years ago.

The Canadian ethanol industry is already playing defence, insisting that high energy prices, not diversion of corn to ethanol plants, are causing food prices to spike.

In a statement, the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association said cutting ethanol production would not "meaningfully lower food prices or alleviate drought concerns."

The federal government has offered two main reasons for the ethanol mandate: meeting the country's greenhouse-gas reduction targets and making Canada a clean energy leader.

The mandate has spawned a thriving domestic industry, which now counts roughly 20 ethanol plants, producing some 2.2 billion litres a year. That's enough to meet roughly 85 per cent of the legislated demand. Canadian refineries gets the rest from the United States and is now the largest foreign buyer of U.S. ethanol.

So Canada is at least indirectly contributing to the global supply crunch for corn, identified by the UN.

Story continues below advertisement

And while it is true that ethanol and other biofuels curb greenhouse-gas emissions, it is a benefit that comes at a steep price to taxpayers. Ottawa and the provinces generously subsidize the industry to the tune of roughly $250-million per year, making ethanol one of Ottawa's priciest greenhouse-gas reduction schemes going.

If there is a more efficient way to lower greenhouse gases, Ottawa and the provinces should do it.

And if ethanol truly is the answer to making energy less expensive and more sustainable – as the industry insists – then the product should stand on its own in the market, without subsidies or mandates.

The push for ethanol has always been good politics. But in a world of scarcity and steep prices, it is no longer an obvious policy winner.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
National Business Correspondent

Barrie McKenna is correspondent and columnist in The Globe and Mail's Ottawa bureau. From 1997 until 2010, he covered Washington from The Globe's bureau in the U.S. capital. During his U.S. posting, he traveled widely, filing stories from more than 30 states. Mr. McKenna has also been a frequent visitor to Japan and South Korea on reporting assignments. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨