Mountainous piles of steel pipe are being staged across four American states in anticipation of building the biggest-capacity pipeline proposed to date to move crude from North Dakota's prolific oil patch.
But stockpiling the pipe is a gamble for the Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners LP's Dakota Access Pipeline, a $3.8-billion (U.S.), 1,820-kilometre project that still requires approval from regulators in North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois.
"What the company does is at their own risk," said Julie Fedorchak, chairwoman of the North Dakota Public Service Commission.
The three-member panel has signalled its approval of the company's project in North Dakota, the pipeline's longest leg, but Ms. Fedorchak said a final decision is several weeks away.
If approved, the Dakota Access Pipeline would move at least 450,000 barrels of North Dakota crude daily through South Dakota and Iowa to an existing pipeline in Patoka, Ill., where shippers can access Midwest and Gulf Coast markets.
Energy Transfer Partners announced the project last year, just days after North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple urged industry and government officials to build more pipelines to keep pace with the state's oil production. He said doing so will reduce truck and oil train traffic, curb natural gas flaring and create more markets for the state's oil and gas.
North Dakota is the No. 2 oil producer in the U.S. behind Texas. It pumps about 1.2 million barrels a day, with about half of it moved by rail. Recent derailments and fires involving North Dakota crude – including the Lac-Mégantic, Que., disaster two years ago that killed 47 people – have drawn criticism from politicians and the public about using trains to move crude oil.
Energy Transfer Partners spokeswoman Vicki Granado said Thursday the company is optimistic the necessary permits will be obtained in all states, with construction expected to start late this year or early 2016. The company, which has the shipping commitments it needs from oil producers, hopes to have the pipeline running late next year.
Ms. Granado said that, so far, Energy Transfer Partners has acquired 72 per cent of the easements needed along the route, which crosses 50 counties in the four states. The company has said it would use the eminent domain process to acquire other easements if agreements with landowners can't be reached voluntarily.
The company said it has three storage yards in North Dakota, and two each in South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois. Near Richardton, in western North Dakota, pipe began coming to a staging area along Interstate 94 a few weeks ago by rail, city commission president Frank Kirschenheiter said. "It's quite a pile of pipe," he said.
Justin Kringstad, director of the North Dakota Pipeline Authority, said it's not uncommon for companies to stage pipe while still in the permitting process. "In order to hit a timeline, they absolutely have to get that material ready in advance with the goal of obtaining permission so construction can start immediately," Mr. Kringstad said.
He said stockpiling pipe ahead of permits usually works out, but sometimes it can take years for the intended project to occur. For example, he said, Calgary-based TransCanada Inc. has had pipe stockpiled for several years for its multibillion-dollar Keystone XL pipeline, which has been stalled by environmental objections. That project would move Canadian oil sands crude to Gulf Coast refineries, as well as about 100,000 barrels of domestic oil daily from North Dakota.
Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, said he believes the Dakota Access Pipeline will be permitted, in part because it will be safer than moving the state's crude by train. The pipeline would replace at least four, lengthy oil trains daily, he said. "We're confident of the project moving forward," Mr. Ness said. "There will always be naysayers but this is a great project and it will improve safety."
This content appears as provided to The Globe by the originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.