Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The hope is that the Northern Gateway pipeline will allow producers to ship oil to Asia from the British Columbia coast.


A federal panel's recommendation that Enbridge Inc. proceed with its $6.5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline gives oil producers renewed hope for access to rich Asian markets, even though numerous risks remain for the contentious project.

Oil sector officials and analysts said the approval by the Joint Review Panel, which followed two years of regulatory proceedings across British Columbia and Alberta, raises the odds the industry will gain a new route to send its rapidly growing crude output to international customers, and capture stronger prices available in global markets.

"Today's decision is the first step towards improving access to new markets for Canadian producers," said Suncor Energy Inc. chief executive Steve Williams, whose company is a major supporter of the 525,000-barrel-a-day pipeline. "The decision emphasizes the need for the pipeline and the importance of pipeline and marine safety. We know the next steps are going to involve listening to stakeholders and understanding ways to address their concerns."

Story continues below advertisement

The JRP concluded Thursday that the economic benefits of the pipeline to Kitimat, B.C, from Alberta would outweigh the environmental risks.

The panel's decision is a win for the energy industry, but only for the first stage of what still promises to be a difficult and drawn out process that could eventually end up in the courts if First Nations that oppose the project make good on their warnings.

The panel attached 209 conditions for the pipeline regarding wildlife monitoring, spill prevention and response, maintaining $950-million of insurance coverage and a long list of other requirements.

Enbridge CEO Al Monaco suggested none of the conditions would be a deal-breaker for the project.

"We believe the panel has conducted a very thorough review. Based on our preliminary look at the conditions of their recommendations, they're tough but they should be, given everybody's goal to make sure we deliver a safe project and we protect the environment," he said.

A spokeswoman for Cenovus Energy Inc. said the conditions appear consistent with a preliminary list that the panel had released earlier this year.

"It's a positive step in the regulatory process. It's definitely not over and we understand that there is still some work to be done with communities along the pipeline route, but we see this as a good indication," Cenovus's Jessica Wilkinson said.

Story continues below advertisement

Still, the ruling elicited criticism from environmental groups and some First Nations, and the project is expected to face unrelenting opposition from those camps.

Enbridge touts Northern Gateway as a fix to the industry's problems of pipeline congestion and heavy reliance on one export market, the U.S. The issue is complicated by a years-long delay in a U.S. decision for TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL pipeline to Texas refineries, which would also pay up for Canadian crude.

Alberta heavy crude routinely sells for a discount to U.S. light oil of about $30 (U.S.) a barrel or more due to difficulties moving it out of Alberta, though increasing oil-by-rail shipments has relieved some of the pressure in the past year. Still, with Alberta oil sands production forecast to double in the next 10 years, the industry is exploring all options for piping crude to the nation's coasts.

A pipeline to the Pacific would expose the crude to higher international prices, generating better corporate returns and more money back to the the Alberta public purse, companies and governments have said.

Suncor, Cenovus Energy Inc., MEG Energy Corp, China's CNOOC Ltd. and others, which have all chipped in financial contributions for the regulatory process, have invested billions of dollars in oil sands projects and expansions, and transport problems represent one of their biggest risks.

But with a startup date of 2018 it may be some time before the producers get their price relief they want, said Jackie Forrest, senior director at IHS CERA, the energy consultancy.

Story continues below advertisement

"In that time frame, we're going to need a lot more than just one project in order to provide enough takeaway capacity from Western Canada, because our supply is growing more than this," Ms. Forrest said.

The project still requires final approval from Ottawa, expected in about six months.

Northern Gateway isn't only conduit proposed to move bitumen to the West Coast. On Monday, Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. applied for a $5.4-billion expansion to its Trans Mountain pipeline to the Vancouver area from Alberta that would triple capacity to 890,000 barrels a day. That project also faces opposition from environmental groups as well as the mayors of Vancouver and Burnaby, B.C., and some first nations leaders.

Greg Stringham, vice-president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said however that the positive ruling on Northern Gateway shed a positive light on the Trans Mountain proposal.

"It's not only for this pipeline, but it really does open the door for market access off the west coast, and that is really critical," Mr. Stringham said.

Meanwhile, TransCanada Corp. is moving toward applying to Build its 1.1 million barrel a day Energy East pipeline to New Brunswick from Alberta, which would allow Canadian crude to be shipped as far as India.

Story continues below advertisement

With files from reporter Shawn McCarthy in Ottawa.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies