Skip to main content

Energy and Resources Irving refinery increasingly using rail to transport crude

The Irving Oil refinery in Saint John. The refinery, Canada’s largest, has increased its ability to source crude by rail over the past 2 1/2 years to take advantage of cheaper North American supplies, a market shift that’s unlikely to reverse course amid fallout from Saturday’s Lac-Mégantic freight train disaster.

Roger Hallett/The Globe and Mail

Irving Oil Ltd.'s New Brunswick refinery, Canada's largest, has increased its ability to source crude by rail over the past 2-1/2 years to take advantage of cheaper North American supplies, a market shift that's unlikely to reverse course amid fallout from Saturday's Lac-Mégantic freight train disaster.

The North Dakota Bakken crude loaded on the train, which careened down an incline into the centre of Lac-Mégantic, was headed to Irving's 300,000-barrel-a-day facility in Saint John, sold by a subsidiary of Miami, Fla.-based distributor World Fuel Services Corp.

"They are acquiring crude from the Midwest because, even after all the cost considerations, logistical costs in particular, at least until recently, it's been less expensive than some of their traditional waterborne crude feedstocks," said Michael Ervin, vice-president and director of consulting at Kent Marketing Services Ltd., which provides research and consulting in the Canadian refining and marketing business.

Story continues below advertisement

The disaster has focused attention on oil-by-rail shipments, which have grown in recent years as North American pipelines have become congested, and as refiners on the East Coast of the continent have been squeezed by imported crude prices that have run ahead of those from Western Canada and those delivered to the U.S. Midwest and Midcontinent.

Refineries throughout the Atlantic basin – eastern North America, Western Europe and the Caribbean – have been battered in recent years by overcapacity, forcing them to find cheaper options. Irving, which sells its petroleum products in Atlantic Canada and the U.S. Northeast, had purchased nearly all its crude from such foreign suppliers as Saudi Arabia, the North Sea and Newfoundland until the market began to shift in 2011 in favour of the cheaper domestic crudes.

Growth in rail volumes, which has eased some of the congestion on North American pipelines and paved the way for increased oil production, created a price gap that more than accommodated the added cost of rail transportation to facilities like Irving Oil's. At its widest last winter, the premium on international benchmark Brent oil was more than $23 a barrel to North American marker West Texas Intermediate as Canadian and U.S. supplies accumulated in the U.S. Midwest, particularly in Cushing, Okla., a storage hub.

Still, that spread has since narrowed considerably – on Tuesday it was $4.28 a barrel, meaning that any change in crude supply sourcing by Irving or any other East Coast refineries is more likely to be driven by prices than reactions to last week's catastrophic derailment.

In March, former Irving Oil president Mike Ashar told a conference in Texas that the refinery "had access to 200,000 barrels a day of rail-delivered crude," up from just 3,000 at the start of 2011. "As far as I know, it's the largest at a refinery in North America," Mr. Ashar said, according to the energy news service Argus Media.

In addition, family-owned Irving signed a multi-year deal with Houston-based Buckeye Partners LP late last year to use its crude oil storage and terminal facilities at Albany, N.Y. Buckeye modified its terminal to handle crude oil and ethanol trains with capacity of more than 135,000 barrels a day.

The recently squeezed price differential may give Irving pause before expanding its rail delivery capability much more, however, Mr. Ervin said.

Story continues below advertisement

An Irving Oil spokesperson did not return calls seeking details on the refinery's crude supply.

With files from Reuters

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter