Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Some 15,000 pieces of pipe for TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL pipeline lie in a field in North Dakota on April 23, 2013. photo by Nathan VanderKlippe

The Globe and Mail

The push to expand markets for Alberta's landlocked oil is losing one of its biggest promoters as a new political establishment in the province seeks a clean break from a history of failed pipeline diplomacy.

A New Democratic Party majority government led by Rachel Notley has pledged to tone down Alberta's lobbying efforts for long-stalled pipeline proposals, a sharp detour after years of fruitless cheerleading under the Progressive Conservatives.

The PCs' 43-year dynasty collapsed in a stunning electoral defeat on Tuesday and leader Jim Prentice resigned from politics.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Notley's win, and the rise of the labour-friendly NDP, has broken up the common front between Canada's energy-pumping heartland and the federal Conservative Party in Ottawa.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government has championed multibillion-dollar pipeline projects to Canada's east and west coasts for years, famously deriding opponents of major energy projects as foreign-funded "radicals." By contrast, Ms. Notley favours domestic refining and more stringent environmental controls in the oil sands, and supports some export schemes over others.

"Certainly, in the pro-pipeline quarters, there was a lot of optimism with the arrival of Jim Prentice, because of his background at the federal level, as well as his stated and very clear interest in engaging with First Nations on issues related to access and land-use and pipelines," said Joseph Doucet, dean of the University of Alberta's business school.

"I think there's probably trepidation now, both based on the change as well as some of the policies and preferences in the campaign."

The NDP win jolted markets on Wednesday, as investors and industry analysts parsed the unknown party's campaign pledges – which include reviewing energy-sector royalty rates and raising the corporate tax rate to 12 per cent from today's level of 10 per cent.

Ms. Notley has said she is not opposed to TransCanada Corp.'s $12-billion Energy East proposal and Kinder Morgan Inc.'s Trans Mountain project. But she has said she would end lobbying for Keystone XL and has cast doubt on the viability of Enbridge Inc.'s Northern Gateway – the only major pipeline proposal to obtain regulatory approval.

Canada's national energy regulator gave the $7.9-billion project the go-ahead last year, but it is subject to 209 conditions. The project also faces legal challenges and entrenched opposition from coastal aboriginal groups in British Columbia. If built, it would deliver up to 525,000 barrels a day of oil sands-derived crude to a super-tanker port at Kitimat, B.C., giving the energy industry long-sought access to richer global markets.

Story continues below advertisement

Enbridge chief executive Al Monaco said on Wednesday the company has not spoken to Ms. Notley about the project. He said Enbridge and its partners are committed to the pipeline despite lingering questions about how well officials are prepared on the West Coast to respond to oil spills, and costs that have climbed to about $500-million.

"Frankly, we think the view is worth the climb here on this project, and hopefully with some further discussion the [premier-designate] would agree with that," Mr. Monaco said.

Some analysts doubt that the fate of any pipeline project hangs on provincial support.

Canadian oil shipments to the United States spiked to 3.1 million barrels per day in January, up 12.8 per cent over the same month a year ago, even as pipelines such as Keystone XL face delays.

The increase occurred in the midst of an aggressive lobbying effort by Alberta officials in Washington aimed at winning support for the controversial pipeline project.

"I'm not sure what it accomplished," Steven Paget, analyst at FirstEnergy Capital Corp, said of the lobbying. "I'm not sure pulling it back is going to change much."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies