Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Leonard Waverman is former dean of Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary.

The contentious purchase of Nexen Inc. by a division of China National Offshore Oil Corp. is on hold while the federal government decides whether it is of "net benefit" to Canada. But the net benefit test in the Investment Canada Act is vague, and gives Ottawa a great deal of latitude in how to evaluate any transaction.

How should the government view this deal? By examining both the economics and the politics – and in this case, it's the political benefits that really matter. Here is a breakdown of the issues at play.

Story continues below advertisement

KEY ECONOMIC FACTORS

Management

Some will say that Calgary-based Nexen has been poorly managed, and new owners would likely bring in new management. However, we have little history of Chinese state-owned oil firms managing oil assets or operating oil sands plants. If management is the problem, change can be achieved by an activist shareholder. There is no need for a takeover to accomplish this.

Verdict: No net benefit.

Increase in foreign capital

Some suggest that Canada needs this deal because it brings in foreign investment. But the world's capital markets are bigger than CNOOC Ltd. and more flexible. Smaller firms such as Progress Energy (the subject of a takeover bid by Malaysia's Petronas) or Athabasca Oil are capital constrained. Progress, for example, is in no financial position to construct a multibillion-dollar liquid natural gas terminal. Athabasca Oil likely could not have raised capital to build a large oil sands facility. But Nexen appears able to raise the debt and equity capital to grow. Certainly, large Canadian companies such as Canadian Natural Resources, Suncor Energy and Cenovus appear to have plenty of access to capital.

Verdict: Limited net benefit

Story continues below advertisement

Employment

CNOOC has publicly offered to maintain employment in Canada at 80 per cent of current levels for five years. An independent, Canadian-controlled Nexen would likely offer more. Past experience has shown that foreign acquirers will walk away from such promises when the economy gets tough – which is one reason the government is pressing CNOOC for firmer job commitments.

Verdict: No net benefit

Head-office jobs

CNOOC would make Calgary its North American headquarters. This is a positive, but the total effect on head office employment is unknown and likely small.

Verdict: Limited net benefit

Story continues below advertisement

KEY POLITICAL FACTORS

U.S. Politics

The growing supply of North American crude, and Canada's inability to get our oil to world markets, forces us to sell it to the United States at a large discount to the world price. The U.S. then uses domestic politics to undercut the benefits to us. Washington's failure to approve the Keystone pipeline is entirely due to political calculations; the pipeline makes economic sense for both the U.S. and Canada.

We need additional markets outside the U.S. for our reserves of oil and gas. The CNOOC purchase of Nexen would demonstrate to American politicians and U.S. citizens that Canada will not keep turning the other cheek.

CNOOC can ship large volumes of oil to China if, and only if, Canada can increase its oil-transportation capacity to the West Coast. But if a major Chinese oil company were to control a greater proportion of our oil reserves, it will force Americans to recognize the genuine international interest in exporting Canadian oil to non-U.S. destinations.

Verdict: Net benefit to Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Trade relations with China

Canada has belatedly enhanced its political and economic ties with China, and there is a growing two-way investment and trade relationship between the two countries. A rejection of this deal would hamper that progress, curbing Canadian investment in China and Chinese presence in Canada.

It's important we show the Chinese we are committed to a true long-term relationship with them.

Verdict: Net benefit to Canada

ADDING IT UP

The benefits of the Nexen deal outweigh the risks. The government can, however, say yes to CNOOC while also limiting the scope of involvement by state-owned enterprises in our energy sector. I would establish caps on any single country's ownership of Canadian resources by state-owned enterprises, and extract as much as possible in promises from Beijing in return for approving the deal – something I am sure the federal government is working on.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies