Skip to main content

Protesters rally against the Keystone XL oil pipeline as U.S. President Barack Obama's motorcade arrives at the Jefferson Hotel in Washington, July 11, 2013.

Yuri Gripas/REUTERS

Barack Obama is refusing to give Ottawa the quick answer it wants on the Keystone XL pipeline in spite of a State Department report that dispels the U.S. President's main climate-change fears.

The White House said Sunday it will wait at least another 90 days to make a final decision as it awaits vital input from other government departments and agencies, raising the possibility that the U.S. President may avoid a decision on the controversial project until after the November U.S. midterm elections for fear of alienating Democratic voters.

On Friday, the U.S. State Department answered Mr. Obama's main concerns about climate change by concluding that the TransCanada Corp. pipeline would not significantly boost greenhouse gas emissions or Canadian oil sands output.

Story continues below advertisement

But White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, Mr. Obama's top adviser, insisted the President is still looking for more guidance and won't be rushed into a quick decision. Keystone XL would carry 830,000 barrels a day of diluted bitumen from Alberta's oil sands and light oil from North Dakota's Bakken fields to the massive refining complex on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Western oil producers are eager for expanded pipeline capacity to access new markets and avoid bottlenecks in the U.S. Midwest, but there has been significant opposition from environmentalists.

"The Friday report is an important input into the process. We'll hear from other cabinet secretaries," Mr. McDonough told NBC's Meet the Press.

"We have one department with a study. Now we have other expert agencies … The president wants to make his decision based on the most sound science," said Mr. McDonough.

Asked about the risk of a decision stretching beyond the election, Canada's Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver borrowed a hockey analogy, telling CTV's Question Period that he hoped Mr. Obama won't "rag the puck."

In an e-mailed statement, Mr. Oliver acknowledged the decision is political and not tied to the findings of any one report. "I think everyone understands that it's the President who is going to decide on this, irrespective of the process," Mr. Oliver said.

Nonetheless, he said Ottawa expects "an expeditious decision."

During a recent visit to Washington, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird was even blunter about what Canada wants. "The time for a decision on Keystone is now, even if it's not the right one. We can't continue in this state of limbo," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

The release of Friday's report triggers a 90-day review period in which other U.S. departments and agencies can weigh in on various issues, including environmental effects, energy security and the economy. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has no firm deadline for making a final recommendation to Mr. Obama on whether the project is in the U.S. national interest.

Mr. McDonough hinted at those other issues, pointing out that the U.S. is quickly becoming energy self-sufficient and expressed concerns about climate change's role in the continuing California drought.

Some industry analysts worry a final decision on Keystone might now be delayed until after the U.S. mid-term elections in November, leaving the issue in the hands of Mr. Obama's successor.

"A final decision isn't expected until this summer and could well occur after November's congressional election," Kevin Hebner of JP Morgan Chase Bank in New York said Sunday in a research note.

Meanwhile, a leading pipeline opponent said the State Department report is tainted by a conflict of interest. Tom Steyer, a billionaire Democratic Party donor, urged Mr. Kerry to conduct an independent review of the "defective" Jan. 30 environmental report on the pipeline.

The final environmental impact statement on Keystone "has suffered from a process that raises serious questions about the integrity of the document," Mr. Steyer wrote to Mr. Kerry in a letter, according to Bloomberg News.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Steyer is the former chief executive officerof the hedge fund Farallon Capital Management LLC and a major donor to Mr. Obama, who is being pressed by Democratic donors to reject the pipeline amid more signs it is headed for approval. TransCanadaCorp.'s pipeline would carry Canadian oil sands crude to U.S. refineries in Texas.

Mr. Steyer said the impact statement is flawed because a TransCanada contractor, Environmental Resources Management, was hired to write the report. The company made "problematic representations" in conflict of interest disclosures about its oil industry ties, the letter claimed. "It is critical that an independent and transparent review … commence immediately," wrote Mr. Steyer, founder of the NextGen Climate Action.

A TransCanada official was not immediately available for comment.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter