Skip to main content

An aerial view of an oil sands facility near Fort McMurray, Alta.

Jeff McIntosh/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Some of the world's costliest energy projects are in Alberta's oil sands and some could be cancelled without higher oil prices, according to a new report by a financial think-tank that focuses on climate risk.

The study by the Carbon Tracker Initiative highlighted 20 of the biggest projects around the world that need a minimum oil price of $95 (U.S.) a barrel to be economically viable.

Most on the list require prices well north of $110 a barrel and a few in the oil sands even need prices higher than $150, said the report.

Story continues below advertisement

Crude for September deliver was trading at around $97 a barrel in New York on Friday.

In total, the 20 projects represent close to $91-billion in capital spending over the next decade.

The report's authors question whether those funds should be invested in risky projects.

"This analysis demonstrates the worsening cost environment in the oil industry and the extent to which producers are chasing volume over value at the expense of returns," said CTI analyst Andrew Grant.

"Investors will ask whether it is prudent for oil companies to bet on ever higher oil prices when they could be returning cash to shareholders."

High on the list were Houston-based ConocoPhillips' oil sands operations, which include joint ventures with Cenovus Energy Inc. at Foster Creek and Christina Lake and with Total E&P Canada at Surmont.

A spokeswoman for Cenovus, which operates Foster Creek and Christina Lake, questioned how CTI came up with its figures, as its steam-driven projects have supply costs between just $35 and $65 a barrel.

Story continues below advertisement

CTI also flagged Shell's Carmon Creek project and ExxonMobil's Aspen and Kearl projects.

Other pricey projects highlighted in the report were in deep-water or ultra deep-water off West Africa and Brazil, as well as in the Arctic.

In May, Total and partner Suncor Energy Inc. decided to indefinitely defer their $11-billion Joslyn North mine in Alberta because the economics just weren't good enough.

And in June, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers predicted oil sands production would grow at a slower pace than previously expected because of rising costs and capital constraints.

It sees output hitting 4.8 million barrels a day by 2030, about two and a half times higher than last year's output of 1.9 million barrels.

But the figure is 7.7 per cent lower than the 5.2 million barrels of daily oil sands output CAPP predicted for the same time frame last year.

Story continues below advertisement

The CTI, funded by a range of European and American foundations, describes itself as a not-for-profit organization "set-up to produce new thinking on climate risk."

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter