Skip to main content

Energy and Resources Resolute continues work on boreal deal, sues Greenpeace over logging allegations

Greenpeace claims that Resolute has been logging in off-limits boreal areas in Canada.

Markus Mauthe/Greenpeace

Talks for a deal with environmentalists have broken off, but Resolute Forest Products Inc. says it remains committed to hammering out a plan to protect Canada's ecologically fragile boreal forest.

Right now, though, the Montreal-based newsprint, pulp and paper producer is busy protecting its own reputation.

Resolute is in a front line court battle to counter what it says are false and malicious claims by Greenpeace Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Not that long ago, both Resolute and Greenpeace Canada were sitting at the same table with other environmental and industry players trying to work out a Canada-wide pact to set aside huge swaths of boreal forest under terms of the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement (CBFA).

Now, Resolute has filed a lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court seeking damages of $5-million, as well as punitive damages of $2-million, plus costs, against Greenpeace and two of its activists for an allegedly false and misleading report about the company's logging practices in Ontario and Quebec.

Resolute's actions, and Greenpeace's withdrawal several months ago from the agreement, underline how volatile and difficult relations remain between Canada's forestry sector and environmentalists, despite best efforts within the CBFA over the past three years to agree on a new era of collaboration over sustainable forestry practices.

In its suit, Resolute alleges that Greenpeace falsely attacked it for logging in off-limits areas in northwestern Ontario and parts of Quebec, as well as for having a poor record on its pay and pension practices and for marketing green products that are not truly green.

"Greenpeace is presently reviewing a Statement of Claim submitted by Resolute Forest Products' lawyers. We are disappointed that our efforts to protect Canada's forests have prompted this bullying tactic," said Richard Brooks, the forest campaign co-ordinator for Greenpeace Canada.

"Greenpeace is quite willing to defend our criticism of Resolute's forest practices. We will vigorously defend ourselves and Canada's forests."

None of the allegations have been proven in court.

Story continues below advertisement

"Resolute will continue to rigorously defend our reputation, the reputation of our employees and our business partners from inaccuracies and deceptive allegations by Greenpeace," said Resolute spokesman Seth Kursman.

Greenpeace withdrew from the agreement last December, claiming that Resolute was logging in protected areas; a second group, Vancouver-based Canopy, later also pulled out. (Although talks between Resolute and environmental groups have ceased, other companies are continuing discussions under the auspices of the CBFA.)

Earlier this year, Greenpeace backed away from the allegations after Resolute threatened a lawsuit.

Greenpeace recently produced its new allegations and Resolute took legal action.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter