Skip to main content

An oil derrick is seen at a fracking site for extracting oil outside of Williston, N.D. To this point, the impact of aggressive unconventional resource development has remained bottled up in Canada and the U.S. Big oil and gas producers around the rest of the world have been immune to North American price pressures and the need to compete for market share. This is likely to change over the next five years as LNG tankers start to sail.

SHANNON STAPLETON/Reuters

This question keeps getting repeated: "Will shale gas and tight oil technologies proliferate beyond North America?"

Of course they will. There is no precedent for game-changing innovations in any business to respect territorial boundaries. So some remaining questions are, under what conditions will shale gas and tight oil be developed in other countries, how long will it take, and where first?

With respect to necessary conditions, it seems Texas has the right stuff. At a major conference in Dallas last week, a few thousand exuberant U.S. oil and gas executives were gushing over recent production growth from unconventional resources. North Dakota's Bakken seems like yesterday's news as attention now shines on the productive oil potential of the legendary Texas Permian Basin.

Story continues below advertisement

The stock, U.S. oil man's answer to what drives such domestic exploration frenzy is the American principle of landowners' mineral rights – if you own the land on the surface you also have title to the oil and gas beneath your feet. This alignment of financial interests between private landowners and oil companies lubricates the wheels of capitalism like nowhere else. Ergo, the converse argument goes, we are unlikely to see meaningful shale gas or tight oil development in other parts of the world, where no such subsurface benefits accrue to the landowner. But there are flaws in this line of thinking.

For one thing, there have been plenty of game-changing innovations in oil and gas exploration and development over the past 150 years – rotary drilling, offshore platforms, 3D seismic to name a few – all of which have been put to work around the world. Further, Canada's minerals are largely the property of the Crown, yet the country has grown to be the fourth-largest producer of oil and gas in the world and has readily embraced, and in fact helped pioneer, innovations in unconventional resource development. Beyond North America, countries with state-owned oil enterprises and limited property rights are also places that have developed the most prolific oil and gas production; Russia and Saudi Arabia come to mind.

Although property rights are a debatable catalyst, germinating a shale gas or tight oil revolution does require a special condition that Canada and the U.S. can claim a lead in (for the moment): An abundance of adaptable infrastructure.

Since the origins of the North American oil and gas business in the late 1850s, trillions of dollars have been spent on building a responsive, critical mass of oil field service equipment, upstream processing facilities, pipelines, roads, railroads, electrical power lines, and all the other infrastructure needed for operating a large-scale, efficient industry. Other big producing countries have varying degrees of iron, too, however the concept of infrastructure isn't limited to rigs, tanks and pipes.

A highly evolved regulatory bureaucracy for oil and gas is a major asset in places like Texas and Alberta, and is something that is lacking in many regions thought to have unconventional resources, for example Eastern Europe. But the real secret sauce is the now-public knowledge gained from drilling hundreds of thousands of wells. After 150 years of drilling, the North American industry knows the location of the most prolific oil and gas reservoirs, especially ones like the Permian Basin that were considered old and "mature" less than a decade ago. Going back to these established fields with new drilling and completion technologies means that there is no need to waste time poking holes in the ground to see if something is there; the only debate is how much more can be recovered. New technology, infrastructure and equipment, regulatory sophistication, and long-standing knowledge are fertile conditions for the current domestic boom. When combined with free market capitalism, it's a system that is difficult to replicate.

Although the conditions may not seem aligned in other countries that have shale gas and tight oil potential, it's only a matter of time before large producers wake up. They've been asleep, because they haven't felt the most important condition of all: Competitive pressure.

To this point, the impact of aggressive unconventional resource development has remained bottled up in Canada and the U.S. Big oil and gas producers around the rest of the world have been immune to North American price pressures and the need to compete for market share. This is likely to change over the next five years as LNG tankers start to sail. Similarly, as more domestic oil displaces American imports, pressure will be felt by big global producers to respond. Like any business with stale and unchallenged processes, it takes an assault on market share to launch innovation.

Story continues below advertisement

There is nothing that speeds up the adoption of new technologies and processes faster than the heat of global competition. When? The proliferation of shale gas and tight oil technologies will happen well before the end of the decade. And when the rest of world starts producing shale gas and tight oil in meaningful quantities, the next question that will be repeated will be, "What now?"

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter