Skip to main content

Rail cars loaded with pipe for the first Keystone pipeline sit on a siding in Milton, N.D.

Eric Hylden/Associated Press/Eric Hylden/Associated Press

TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp. say they are conducting a public process to determine the level of customer interest in a potential new pipeline – the Alaska Pipeline Project.

The large oil and gas pipeline companies say they want to gauge interest in securing capacity on the pipeline, which would transport gas from Alaska's North Slope to a gas liquefaction (LNG) terminal in Alaska, or the border of British Columbia and Alberta.

The process will take place Aug. 31 to Sept. 14.

Story continues below advertisement

It will be conducted in accordance with the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, which requires TransCanada to assess market interest in the pipeline every two years after its first open season.

All of the options for the pipeline provide for a minimum of five delivery points for local natural gas connections in Alaska.

TransCanada has said that as low prices cause conventional Western Canadian producers to slow production, sources from areas like Alaska are necessary to supplant those volumes in the North American market.

TransCanada floated two options when it proposed to build its Alaska pipeline. One would run south to Alberta and connect with its North American system.

The other would end up at the port of Valdez, Alaska, where the gas would be chilled into a liquid state, enabling it to be transported across the Pacific to Asia by tanker.

When TransCanada and partner Exxon Mobil launched their open season to gauge customer interest two years ago, the cost estimate of the Alberta option was $32-billion to $41-billion (U.S.), and the Valdez option was between $20-billion and $26-billion.

Both would be in service around 2020.

Story continues below advertisement

The three major natural gas producers in Alaska are ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and BP.

TransCanada has so far not been involved in LNG – proposals to import the fuel into Quebec and New York in recent years didn't pan out – but ConocoPhillips, BP and ExxonMobil have extensive experience building liquefaction terminals around the world.

There are also a number of proposals to build liquefied natural gas terminals on Canada's West Coast to move gas from prolific B.C. shale formations to market.

The furthest along is one planned for Kitimat, B.C., on the northern coast. U.S. producer Apache Corp. would operate it with its partners, Canadian natural gas giant Encana Corp. and U.S. firm EOG Resources Corp.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies