Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

A new anti-Keystone XL ad campaign is targeting U.S. Democrats in a bid to convince President Barack Obama to reject the pipeline proposal.

YOUTUBE

A new anti-Keystone XL coalition launched on Monday with a simple message: There's no benefit to Americans, only grave risks, from the controversial plan to ship Alberta's oil-sands crude across the U.S. heartland to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

The profits would go to Canada, the oil would be exported, and Americans would suffer the spills, claims the "All Risk, No Reward," campaign, which will target Democrats who back the pipeline in an all-out effort to persuade President Barack Obama to reject it later this year.

The coalition, already running television ads, brings together an odd mix of national and state-based groups ranging from rural landowners along the proposed route of the pipeline, such as the Nebraska Farmers Union, to the League of Women Voters.

Story continues below advertisement

"We are really explaining how this pipeline is not in our national interest, and letting other organizations handle the climate message," said Randy Thompson, a Nebraska cattleman and chair of the coalition. "We are very focused on our message, are going to be aggressive to get it out there, and have paid media efforts that have never been part of the anti-KXL movement," he said.

Already an array of big, well-heeled environmental groups like the Sierra Club have mounted major campaigns against Keystone XL, but the emergence of a coalition of grassroots groups after a spill of Alberta oil-sands crude fouled the Arkansas town of Mayflower could broaden the battle.

At a news conference on Monday, coalition organizers said they intended to use the claims of Keystone advocates to stir up opposition. "According to proponents, the environmental destruction of tar-sands drilling should be of no concern to Americans; after all, the oil will be mined in Canada," said New Jersey Democrat Rush Holt, one of the strongest advocates of weaning the United States off fossil fuels. "Further, proponents claim, Americans should not fret about increased dependence upon fossil fuels, as the Keystone XL pipeline would carry those fuels to sea ports for distribution overseas."

For Americans, Keystone XL brings no benefit, just risk, he added: "Why would we want to expose thousands of towns up and down the United States to the same risks faced so catastrophically in Mayflower," where the cleanup of an oil-sands spill from a pipeline with one-10th the capacity is still under way.

The group says it has hundreds of thousands of dollars for targeted advertising and more money on the way, although it declined to identify major donors.

One of its first ads paints the pipeline as a black scar across the United States and says Keystone XL would create only 35 permanent jobs while "tar sands" oil is exported to countries like China and Venezuela.

Backers of the $5-billion project say it would create thousands of jobs and create a reliable and secure source of oil.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta Premier Alison Redford will wade into the increasingly murky debate again on Tuesday when she makes another foray to Capitol Hill seeking support for the pipeline.

The Premier's Office declined to provide a full list of legislators she plans to lobby, saying only that Ms. Redford will meet members of Congress on both sides of the issue during her two-day visit.

Among those she is expected to call on is California Republican Kevin McCarthy, whose role as majority whip in the House of Representatives may be crucial if a threatened congressional effort to wrest control of the Keystone decision from Mr. Obama emerges.

Mr. McCarthy, an unabashed Keystone XL backer, echoes Prime Minister Stephen Harper in suggesting that the choice should be obvious. "Yet after 4 1/2 years, the President still can't make a decision. … This should be a no-brainer," the congressman said last month.

Yet the Alberta government apparently is concerned that the outcome is not such a slam dunk. According to Bloomberg, the province has hired a Washington lobbying firm, Mehlman Vogel Castagnetti Inc., and the Boston-based public relations firm Rasky Baerlein Strategic Communications Inc. Both have strong political connections and both were engaged to help Alberta push the Keystone project.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies