Skip to main content

From Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures comes "Man of Steel,"TM starring Henry Cavill in the role of Clark Kent/Kal-El under the direction of Zack Snyder.

Warner Bros.

Persuasion Notebook offers quick hits on the business of persuasion from The Globe and Mail's marketing and advertising reporter, Susan Krashinsky. Read more on The Globe's marketing page and follow Susan on Twitter @Susinsky .

Stainless steel blades are no match for the man of steel.

As a tie-in with the new Superman movie, Man of Steel, coming out this month, Gillette has struck a marketing deal with Warner Bros. to attempt to harness some social media conversation around a key question: How does Superman shave?

Story continues below advertisement

The campaign seems tailor-made for nerdy delight, with such pop culture heroes as the duo from Mythbusters , Bill Nye the Science Guy , Big Bang Theory actress Mayim Bialik , and filmmaker/comic book aficionado Kevin Smith each making a video offering their own theories. (Since Superman is impervious to earth-made weapons, it stands to reason his beard is as well – ridiculously multi-bladed razors notwithstanding.)

The Reddit-loving crowd this campaign targets, however, also seems the least impressed. Commenters on the website have been quick to point out that the comic books themselves answered this question long ago. (He uses his heat vision , reflected in a mirror , obviously . The mirrors are occasionally the worse for wear.)

While criticism was immediate however, since the campaign launched on May 28 Gillette has seen some positive effects: it counts 51 million impressions on Twitter so far (that is, the number of views of commentary around the question and the campaign itself, positive or negative.) The videos with the theories have been viewed roughly 1.8 million times so far in total, and the ratio of people clicking "like" vs. "dislike" in the voting buttons on YouTube has been 22 to 1. (And comic book inconsistencies being what they are, it can't be worse than what is arguably the most obnoxious commercial on television right now .)

Gillette's position on the controversy is to say that what is in the comic books is not gospel; the company points out that Superman has died in the course of the series in past, and come back to life. (Comic book lovers will almost certainly argue against this point.)

As a marketing strategy for Gillette, however, it's not just fun and games discussing the details of the superhero's toilette. It's also an attempt by the Procter & Gamble-owned brand to catch up with social media.

Last year, feisty startup Dollar Shave Club made a cheap campaign for its mail-order razors that went viral, thanks to a basic understanding of the type of humour and sense of fun that get noticed online and create conversations – a holy grail for marketers today. It also poked holes in the big marketing strategies of established razor companies, which for years have sold shavers as loss leaders in order to rope consumers into buying pricey replacement blades.

By working with Warner Bros., Gillette is hoping to access a socially-engaged crowd and make itself part of a more lighthearted conversation.

Story continues below advertisement

"At the end of the day, content is king," said Rob Chambers , brand manager for Gillette Canada. (The campaign was conceived in the U.S. and is running North America-wide.) "This gave us an opportunity to create content. … It created a nice opportunity for Gillette to play, which is why we're excited about it."

The opportunity came about four months ago when the brand's Connecticut-based ad agency, Concept One Communications, saw a trailer for the movie and noticed that Clark Kent has a beard at one point, and is later clean-shaven when donning his uniform.

It led to talks with the movie studio about a tie-in promotion. There is no Gillette product placement in the movie that the company knows of.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter