Skip to main content

Aerie’s new campaign pledges not to alter photos of its models

Aerie.com

Persuasion Notebook offers quick hits on the business of persuasion from The Globe and Mail's marketing and advertising reporter, Susan Krashinsky. Read more on The Globe's marketing page and follow Susan on Twitter @Susinsky.

They're drop dead gorgeous. They have their hair and makeup done for them. A professional photographer catches them in the best light. And that's enough.

The new ad campaign for Aerie, a lounge wear and lingerie brand targeted to young women, has pledged not to use retouching tools such as Photoshop in the company's advertising.

Story continues below advertisement

The retailer, owned by American Eagle Outfitters, revealed its new strategy on morning show Good Morning America last week.

The models are uniformly beautiful, but the ads no longer alter them to inhuman proportions. The shadow of a muscle or an extra bit of skin is not smoothed away; skin tone appears as is; and while some of the models are still skinnier than most, not all have perfectly flat stomachs or size AA busts.

The retailer's website has also changed; when bra shopping, for example, girls will see models that are the cup size they searched for (rather than the same picture of a supermodel with a variety of sizes listed next to her image). It's not a perfect system: each cup size uses the same model whether the chest circumference is a 30 or a 38 (a big difference.) But it's still worlds away from the approach many other mainstream lingerie brands take.

The change has set off a wave of positive press for the brand, and conversation on social media. The company is encouraging fans to spread the word by posting their own pictures on Instagram and Twitter. Given the amount of goodwill that beauty brand Dove has earned over the years with its criticism of Photoshop (even though it's a standard that changes for parent company Unilever's men's brand, Axe), the chatter around these new changes is sure to earn Aerie plenty of free advertising.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies