Skip to main content

Devonyu/Getty Images/iStockphoto

The federal government has put on hold the implementation of part of Canada's anti-spam law in response to feedback from the business community.

The law, which came into effect in 2014, puts restrictions on e-mails and other electronic communications for promotional purposes. That means that marketers wanting to contact consumers directly this way need their explicit consent to do so.

The government's announcement on Wednesday does not change that: The law continues to be enforced, but for now it shelves a provision to allow private citizens to take legal action against businesses for violating it.

Story continues below advertisement

The government also announced Wednesday that it will ask a parliamentary committee to review the legislation.

Opinion: Now more than ever, Canada needs a strong anti-spam law

Read more: Get your business ready for the latest anti-spam restrictions

The change is the result of a concerted lobbying effort by business groups, who have communicated their concerns to the government about the possibility of lawsuits under CASL.

"Canadians deserve to be protected from spam and other electronic threats so that they can have confidence in digital technology.

At the same time, businesses, charities and other non-profit groups should have reasonable ways to communicate electronically with Canadians," Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, said in a statement on Wednesday.

The law was designed to come into effect in stages:

Story continues below advertisement

  • By June, 2014, businesses had to have consent to send messages to customers for marketing purposes, and had to provide an easy opt-out in all future messages. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, one of three regulators that oversee the law, was in charge of administering penalties for violations, from $1-million for individuals and up to $10-million for businesses in Canada. (Fundraising for registered charities and political campaigns are exempt.) In the first week and a half after the law went into effect, the CRTC received more than 12,000 complaints.
  • In January, 2015, it began to cover “malware,” or malicious software installed on people’s computers and other devices without their permission. Marketers who use apps to advertise to customers had to ensure those apps weren’t infected with malware, and had to have permission to collect personal information, take any actions or install any programs on those devices.
  • On July 1 of this year – in addition to the fines that the CRTC can already hand down for CASL violations – people and organizations would have been given the right to take violators to court and seek damages. That third phase has now been suspended.

Just last year, CRTC chair Jean-Pierre Blais was talking tough about the 2017 deadline.

"Once there's a private right of action … you're on your own. Good luck with that," he said in a speech to marketers in Toronto in March, 2016. "All the more reason to get into compliance as much as you can with us, because it will diminish the risk."

One part of the law that will continue to take effect on July 1 is the end of a three-year grace period for companies to prove they have consent to contact everyone on their marketing lists.

The law also applies to SMS text messages and one-to-one messages sent via social media, such as Facebook's Messenger service.

"You still need to be compliant. But this saves a lot of companies a major headache," said Derek Lackey, president of the Direct Marketing Association of Canada, which was part of the lobbying effort. Mr. Lackey said his membership was concerned they could face "hundreds of millions of dollars" in costs defending "frivolous" lawsuits.

The law has also had a positive effect: Mr. Lackey consults with companies on becoming CASL-compliant, and says some clients have seen the rates of promotional e-mails actually being opened jump from 17 per cent to 43 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's about respecting the consumer, only sending stuff that's relevant to them," he said. "It may be a smaller list, but they're more engaged. … Really good companies who were doing e-mail marketing effectively, were doing this anyway."

There have been increasing complaints, however, about mobile phone text messages – which also require consent and the option to opt-out of future messages.

"CASL as it currently has been functioning is protecting Canadian consumers well," said Wally Hill, vice-president of government and consumer affairs for the Canadian Marketing Association, which plans to encourage the government to permanently abandon the private-right-of-action aspect of the law. He is also hopeful that the review of the legislation will further clarify for businesses how they can stay out of trouble.

"The potential of unfounded lawsuits burdening businesses, in our view, would have been counterproductive. It's a great decision."

Laura Dawson with the Canada Institute says Canadian business leaders need to remind Main Street U.S. how important trade with Canada is to their economy
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter