Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Ontario’s Environment Ministry wants to force former directors of Northstar Aerospace to pay for the cleanup of the site in Cambridge, Ont.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

A battle over who should pay to clean up the toxins that leaked out of a factory in Southwestern Ontario – and into the groundwater underneath nearby homes – is raising concerns on Bay Street.

In a case that could have wide ramifications for Corporate Canada, 12 former board members of bankrupt helicopter-parts maker Northstar Aerospace Inc. and its Canadian unit are fighting an order from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment that would force them to personally pay for the estimated $15-million cleanup of the site in Cambridge, Ont.

The sweeping order against a group of former directors of a public company is a first, lawyers say, although the Ontario Ministry of the Environment has previously issued similar cleanup orders against either directors of small companies or sole owner-operators that had day-to-day responsibility for the pollution in question.

Story continues below advertisement

Some lawyers on Bay Street warn that allowing the move means that anyone sitting, even briefly, on the board of a manufacturer or a resource company could face unlimited liability for a pollution problem discovered years later. Board seats, critics warn, would become impossible to fill, potentially paralyzing public companies or forcing them to flee to other jurisdictions.

The Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD) is so alarmed by the potential precedent that it plans to intervene in the case, which may go before the province's Environmental Review Tribunal.

Stan Magidson, the Institute's president and chief executive officer, said that going after directors "regardless of their culpability" would "be extremely injurious" to Ontario's capital markets and its economy as a whole: "Companies would locate operations elsewhere. … It would be very difficult to find directors, if that was the regulatory regime."

In a submission to the Environmental Review Tribunal, Paul Guy, a lawyer with WeirFoulds LLP acting for the former directors, says his clients made sure the company paid for the remediation until it ran out of money: "The [former directors and officers] did everything they could, for as long as they could."

Kate Jordan, a spokeswoman for the Ministry of the Environment, said the order against the directors was necessary to ensure that air monitoring in more than 450 local homes could continue and more than 200 air-treatment systems at homes, businesses and a church, can keep operating.

"The province stands behind the 'polluter pays' principle," Ms. Jordan said in an e-mail. "The persons responsible for contamination are responsible for cleaning it up."

The dispute comes as courts wrestle with the broader question of whether environmental cleanup orders should be paid first, before other creditors get at the remains of bankrupt companies. It's an impossible dilemma that pits the environment not just against a company's bankers and suppliers, but against pensioners who have seen their benefits slashed when their employer goes belly-up.

Story continues below advertisement

Environment Ministry officials had earlier tried to get their hands on the actual proceeds from the sale of Northstar's assets to pay for the cleanup. But the judge in the insolvency proceedings ruled against them, deeming them simply another creditor. Ministry officials have also tried unsuccessfully to extract $18-million from the bankruptcy of Nortel Networks Corp. to clean up four of that company's polluted former facilities.

Both of those cases go before the Ontario Court of Appeal next month. However, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on a similar issue just last year, in the case of environmental orders issued by the province of Newfoundland and Labrador against AbitibiBowater Inc. The court said that, in most cases, regulators should have the same status as other creditors.

Toronto environmental lawyer Dianne Saxe, who acts for one of Northstar's directors and has written about the issue on her blog, said the company, after discovering the contamination and reporting it to the ministry in 2005, voluntarily spent almost $20-million on remediation measures before it ran out of money last year.

"Really, what they are saying is, officers and directors, whether you have done anything wrong or not, retroactively, you have given a blank cheque for whatever we decide to order to you to do," Ms. Saxe said.

The ministry's November, 2012, order, however, alleges the directors failed to ensure money was put aside to finish the remediation, and permitted the discharge of contaminants that could endanger "human health or safety." The directors deny the allegations.

Both sides are now awaiting a decision from the judge in the insolvency case, Justice Geoffrey Morawetz, on whether the fight should be heard in his courtroom or before the province's Environmental Review Tribunal.

Story continues below advertisement

Northstar Aerospace operated at the Cambridge site as far back as 1981, and used a chemical called trichloroethylene as a metal degreaser. Once widely used, it is now known to cause cancer.

In tests in 2005, however, it was found in nearby groundwater at levels many times higher than the ministry standard, evaporating through the soil and into the air inside nearby homes.

Public health officials told residents their drinking water was safe and that, in most cases, the risk of cancer from their exposure was "very low." But more than 200 homeowners have had to install "indoor air mitigation systems" to filter out the potentially harmful vapours.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies